News & Events

The Sexual Harassment Act - Now In Force

Submitted By Firm: Trilegal

Contact(s): Ajay Raghavan


Date Published: 12/26/2013

Article Type:

Share This:


Most employers are now familiar with the existence of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (the Act).  This Act was pending final notification (as indicated in our earlier newsletter).  The Act has now been formally notified and brought into force with effect from 9 December, 2013 along with the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Rules, 2013 (the Rules).  While the Rules are in force, they have to be placed before the Parliament as per Section 29 of the Act.  The Parliament has a period of 30 days to assess the Rules and it remains to be seen whether it will make any further modifications.
We have briefly assessed the Rules in this newsletter and discussed some gaps and questions that remain which the Rules have failed to address.

Key Provisions in the Rules

Inquiry process: An important addition in the Rules relates to the manner in which a complaint is to be enquired into.  The Rules contain provisions such as (i) the complainant should provide 6 copies of the complaint along with supporting documents and names and addresses of the witnesses; (ii) the accused should be provided copies of the complaint within 7 working days along with supporting documents; (iii) the accused should file his reply within 10 working days of receiving the complaint, etc.  Further to Section 18 of the Act, the Rules also state that any person aggrieved by the recommendations of the complaints committee may prefer an appeal to the appellate authority notified under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.
Annual report:  While the Act already makes it clear that the complaints committee must prepare an annual report, the Rules elaborate on the contents of the report and state that it must include details about the number of complaints received and disposed of, and even the number of workshops or awareness programs against sexual harassment that have been undertaken.  The report also needs to include information on the number of cases pending for more than 90 days and the nature of action taken by the employer.
Action against employees: The Rules provide for types of action that can be taken against an accused who is found to have committed an act of sexual harassment or a complainant who has filed a false or malicious complaint.  Action may be taken in accordance with the company's service rules, and in their absence, the employer may take action including requiring a written apology, issuing a warning, counselling, community service, reprimand or censure, withholding of promotion, withholding of increment or termination from service.  The Rules also provide that where the person in charge of dealing with complaints of sexual harassment publishes the identity of a complainant or witness, he will be liable to pay the employer a sum of INR 5000 as penalty.
Formulate a policy and conduct awareness programs/workshops: The Rules have also elaborated the employer's duty to organize awareness programs and workshops to sensitize employees and orientation programs for members of the complaints committee.  Employers are now required to formulate detailed sexual harassment policies and widely disseminate them at the workplace and use modules developed by the State Government and conduct workshops and awareness programs for sensitizing employees about provisions of the Act.  Employers will also be required to conduct capacity building and skill building programmes, apart from regular orientation programmes and seminars for members of the complaints committee.
While these are a few aspects on which the Rules have been able to throw some light, unfortunately various issues continue to remain unresolved.
Certain ambiguous provisions in the Act had led to a lack of clarity, potentially resulting in onerous conditions being placed on the employer.  It was hoped that the Rules would address these lacunae and ease some of the significant difficulties in interpretation of such provisions of the Act.  A few major concerns that are yet unaddressed in the Rules are:
Committees to be established at each branch when located at 'different places': The Act requires the employers to create different committees for each branch or office, where these branches or offices are located at 'different places'.  The Rules have not provided clarity on whether the employer is required to create committees for each branch or office located in the same city.  We understand from the Parliamentary Standing Committee Report, 2011 that the Ministry did not intend employers to create committees at every branch or office in situations where it would create administrative difficulties and expected these modalities to be elaborated upon in the Rules.  Unfortunately that has not happened and companies will continue to face the dilemma of deciding whether to set up multiple regional or branch specific committees or a single committee which is responsible to handle all claims within the organization.  Informal discussions with the Ministry of Women and Child Development indicate that they are taking a strict view and all establishments with 10 or more employees need to have a separate committee.
Mandatory obligation to initiate criminal proceedings: The Act also imposes a mandatory obligation on the employer to initiate criminal proceedings against the perpetrator in instances of sexual harassment.  The Rules don't clarify whether the employer is required to initiate criminal proceedings even where the aggrieved person is unwilling to approach the police.  This may impose an obligation on the employer to mandatorily report all offences amounting to sexual harassment (however minor) or be penalized for non-compliance irrespective of the complainant's consent or willingness to initiate such action.
Witness list to be shared with accused: The Rules require the complainant to submit to the committee the names and addresses of the witnesses, along with the copies of the complaint and supporting documents and requires the committee to send these documents to the alleged perpetrator of the offence.  However, it is unclear if the intent is to also share the names and addresses of the witnesses with the alleged perpetrator of the offence.  In a sensitive issue such as sexual harassment and especially in cases where the alleged perpetrator is in a supervisory or senior position, sharing the names and addresses of witnesses could lead to potential victimization or intimidation.  While the Parliamentary Standing Committee Report, 2011 suggested including more protection to the witnesses to prevent them from being victimized, this has not been addressed or clarified in the Rules.
No penalty for committee: Under the Act, the primary obligation of prevention and redressal of sexual harassment at the workplace is on the employer.  While there are obligations placed on the committee to complete the inquiry process within strict timelines, prepare annual report etc. there are no penalties on the committee for non-compliance with these provisions.  The provisions of the Act dealing with the duties of the employer are broadly worded and this may result in the employer being penalized for the committee's non-compliance.
Broad definition of workplace: The Act has included a wide definition of the term workplace which does not restrict the scope of the Act to the employer's premises.  While this is a commendable step, this has created some confusion on whether the Act would cover incidents that occur outside the workplace when the employees are interacting in a personal context and not in connection with work.  The Rules have not elaborated on the wide ambit of the definition of 'workplace' and this could potentially increase the employer's liabilities and compliance requirements as it could also cover personal relationships, marital disputes when spouses work with the same employer etc.
Concluding Remarks
While the government's decision to finally bring into force the much needed legislation to address issues of sexual harassment is laudable, the timing and content of the Rules leaves a lot to be desired.  Though the Act passed earlier this year may have had its deficiencies, it certainly was a result of much deliberation and discussions with public stakeholders.  However, the Rules do not seem to have been put through the same process.  A number of issues raised in the Parliamentary Standing Committee Report, 2011 were not incorporated into the Act and there was hope that these would be resolved in the Rules.  That has not happened and authorities may take very strict views on the compliance requirements under the Act and Rules.  Now that the Act and Rules are finally in force, all employers must immediately take steps to constitute committees and implement a policy addressing the provisions of the Act and Rules.

Find an Employment Lawyer

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

As an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel