News & Events

Federal Law on Telecommunications and Broadcasting

Submitted By Firm: Santamarina y Steta

Contact(s): Alejandro Luna, Juan Carlos De La Vega


Jorge León-Orantes B., (Partner) Carlos Díaz, (Associate) Phone: (52 55) 5279-5400

Date Published: 8/7/2014

Article Type:

Share This:

August, 2014



Federal Law on Telecommunications and Broadcasting


On July 14, 2014, the decree by virtue of which the Federal Law on Telecommunications and Broadcasting, and the Law of the Public System of Mexican Broadcasting, as well as other amendments, supplements and repeals to other related telecommunications and broadcasting legal provisions were enacted (the “Decree”), was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation (the “DOF” for its acronym in Spanish). The Decree will become effective 30 calendar days after its publication, this is, on August 13, 2014.


Below please find some references to the most relevant provisions of the Federal Law on Telecommunications and Broadcasting (the “FLTB”), which purpose, among others, is to regulate telecommunications and broadcasting services, and the processes of free competition in the aforementioned sectors sectors.




The FLTB regulates, among others, the following authorities for the enforcement of the FTLB:


Federal Telecommunications Institute (Instituto Federal de Telecomunicaciones, “IFT”, for its acronym in Spanish).


The IFT is in charge of regulating, promoting and supervising the use, development and exploitation of the radio spectrum, the orbital resources, the satellite services, and public telecommunications networks, and the provision of telecommunications and broadcasting services, as well as the access to active and passive infrastructure and other essential assets for the provision of such services. Likewise, IFT has authorities on economic competition matters related to the telecommunications and broadcasting sectors.


Ministry of Communications and Transportation (Secretaría de Comunicaciones y Transportes, "SCT", for its acronym in Spanish).


Among its most relevant authorities, we can mention the following: (i) the issuance of nonbinding opinions to the IFT regarding the granting, renewal and revocation of concessions, as well as for the granting of authorizations for the assignment and change to corporate control; (ii) the planning, establishing, development, and implementation of policies and programs regarding universal and social coverage; (iii) the performance of actions to ensure the access to broadband Internet in public buildings and facilities, and the development of programs to enable access to the Internet in public places; and (iv) the acquisition, establishment and operation, as the case may be, whether directly or through third parties, of telecommunications infrastructure networks and satellite systems for the provision of telecommunications and broadcasting services.


IFT Operation.


The FLTB sets forth the authorities of the IFT. Within such authorities, we can mention the following as the most relevant: (i) the granting of concession titles according to the FLBT; (ii) the implementation of procurement processes as well as the allocation of frequency bands of the radio spectrum; (iii) the establishment of the amount to be paid by concessionaires as compensation to the Mexican State for the granting of concessions; and (iv) the determination of economic agents with dominant power in relevant markets and preponderant economic agents in the telecommunications and broadcasting sectors.


In regard to the operation of the IFT, within the obligations and authorities of its commissioners, it is provided that the commissioners may not abstain from voting unless they have a legal impediment to do so. In the event of a justified absence, he/she has to issue his/her vote in writing prior his/her absence. Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that in order for the commissioners to discuss any matter within their authorities, they have to do so through an interview and only with the people that represent the interests of the agents regulated by IFT. Such interviews shall be registered and there should be a record of the date, place, start time and end time, and the full name of the people who were present in such interview as well as the topics discussed therein.


Radio Spectrum and Orbital Resources.


The radio spectrum is a public good, which administration corresponds to the IFT. In accordance with its use, the radio spectrum shall be classified as follows:  (i) determined; (ii) free; (iv) protected; and (v) reserved.


Concessions’ regime.


The FLTB regulates a new type of concession, named the Sole Concession. This Sole Concession can be granted to provide all kind of telecommunications and broadcasting services (convergent services). The IFT shall grant the Sole Concession for a term of up to 30 years, which may be renewed. Depending on its purposes, the Sole Concession may be classified as follows: (i) commercial; (ii) public; (iii) private; and (iv) social.


The Sole Concession can only be granted to Mexican individuals or companies incorporated in accordance with Mexican laws, taking in consideration the applicable foreign investment regime (up to 100% in telecommunications sector and up to 49% in the broadcasting sector, subject to reciprocity in the broadcasting sector).


Concessions of Radio Spectrum and Orbital Resources.


The concessions granted to use, develop and exploit frequency bands from the radio spectrum for determined use and to occupy and exploit orbital resources, are granted by IFT through a public procurement process, for a term of up to 20 years which may be renewed.


The FLTB provides that simultaneously with the granting of a radio spectrum concession, and in the event that the services to be provided under the aforementioned concession require a Sole Concession, the Sole Concession may be granted in the same administrative act. For concessions for broadcasting services, in the event that the applicant concessionaire has foreign investment, the prior favorable opinion from the National Commission of Foreign Investments is required.


Radio spectrum for social use.


Regarding this type of concessions, it is important to mention that the concessions for social community use can only be requested by nonprofit civil associations, subject to the fulfillment of the requirements established by the FLTB, and in accordance with the regulations that are to be issued by the IFT.


Concession of future orbital resources.


This is a new legal figure, and refers to the possibility for any person to express to the IFT his/her/its interest in order for the Federal Government to obtain orbital resources in favor of the Mexican State.


In order to do so, the interested party shall, among others, provide all documentation to evidence his/her/its technical, financial, legal and administrative capacity, and execute a letter which will establish his/her/its commitment to participate along with the Federal Government in all the required procedures and requirements for the coordination and allocation of the orbital resources in favor of the Mexican State. The interested party shall pay, without reimbursement, all expenses which will be incurred before the International Telecommunications Union (“ITU”), which is the authority in charge of the managing of the orbital resources around the world.


In this procedure, SCT has the authority to determine the admissibility of the application. In the event that an application is admitted, SCT will notify the IFT the amount of the bond or of the letter of credit to be delivered by the interested party, in order to guarantee its commitment.


In the event that the orbital resources are allocated to the Mexican State, the IFT shall grant to the interested party the right to exploit such orbital resources through a direct award of the respective concession.


Leasing of Radio Spectrum.


This legal instrument is aimed to encourage and promote the secondary market for the radio spectrum. This figure applies only for commercial or private frequency bands. In order to lease radio spectrum, concessionaires must comply with the following:


a)     That the lessee has a Sole Concession, or that such Sole Concession has already been requested to the IFT.

b)    That the lessee becomes joint obligor of the concessionaire.

c)     That the continuity of the services is not affected.

d)    That it does not generate concentrations or cross-ownership.




Assignment of Rights.


The FLTB provides that the concessions for commercial or private use may be assigned, with the prior authorization of the IFT. The aforementioned authorization may only be granted by the IFT after three months from the date on which the concession was granted.


If the assignment results from a merger, spin off or corporate restructure, provided such acts are performed within the same group or economic agent, no prior authorization is required. In such event, the only requirement would be to notify the assignment to the IFT.


If due to an assignment, a concessionaire transfers rights and obligations to another concessionaire who is providing similar services in the same geographic location, IFT would only grant the corresponding authorization after having analyzed the competitive effects that such assignment would have.


Shareholders Information.


Article 112 of the FLBT provides the obligation for concessionaires to file to the IFT no later than June 30, on a yearly basis, information regarding their corporate capital, including a list of their shareholders or partners that hold 5% or more of their corporate capital, as well as a list of the individuals who participate directly or indirectly, in 10% or more of their corporate capital.


The provisions of article 112 of the FLBT must be expressly included in the by-laws of the concessionaires, as well as in the share certificates and partnership interest certificates issued by each concessionaire.


Networks and Telecommunications Services.


The FLTB provides a series of specific obligations to concessionaries that operate Public Telecommunications Networks.


Service of “Visiting” User.


The FLTB regulates a legal instrument called “Visiting” User. Such instrument helps to guarantee the continuity of mobile services provided to end users, when they are outside the coverage area of their mobile network.


It is important to point out that concessionaires that exploit a public telecommunications network that provides mobile services, may freely enter into agreements with other concessionaires to provide the service of “Visiting” User with other concessionaires. On the other hand, the economic agent declared preponderant, or dominant in a relevant market, will be obliged to provide the service of “Visiting” User on temporary basis and exclusively in the geographic locations where the other concessionaires do not have infrastructure or where they do not provide mobile services.


Access and Interconnection.


Concessionaires operating a public telecommunications network have the obligation to adopt open network architecture designs, in order to ensure interconnection and interoperability of their networks. For such purpose, concessionaries operating a public telecommunications network are bound to interconnect their networks with other concessionaires’ networks on a non-discriminatory basis, transparently, based on objective criteria, in compliance with the regulations of IFT, within a term no greater than 60 days.


Asymmetric obligations to the economic agents declared preponderant are established in regard to Access and Interconnection. One of such obligations establishes that the preponderant agent shall not charge to the other concessionaires for the ending traffic in its network.


Public Telecommunications Networks with Public Participation.


The Public Network of the State is regulated in the FLTB. Concessions for commercial use for public entities, even if they operate under a scheme of public-private partnerships, shall be considered as a Public Network of wholesale telecommunications services. This Public Network cannot provide services to end-users, unless such Public Network has specific coverage in a geographic zone where no other concessionaire provides services to end-users. Only in such cases, the public governmental entity “Telecomunicaciones de México”, will guarantee the provision of telecommunications services to the end users located in such geographic area until another concessionaire can provide such services.


For the operation and exploitation of the wholesale telecommunications network, the IFT will directly assign to the Mexican State 90MHz of the 700MHz Band. Through such network, the State will provide services under non-discriminatory basis and with competitive prices to the resellers and concessionaires of telecommunications services.


Net Neutrality.


Net Neutrality principles are included in the FLTB. Concessionaires and authorized companies or persons who provide Internet access services must comply with such principles. The IFT shall issue regulations in regard to the compliance of such principles.


Use of State owned property to develop Telecom Infrastructure.


The Executive Branch will establish technical, economical, safety and operational conditions to allow the State owned property, the right-of-way (derecho de vía) of communications means, the infrastructure of broadcasting stations, the electrical transmission towers, the poles and ducts, among other infrastructure, to be available for the use and exploitation of concessionaires under non-discriminatory basis and through the payment of the respective governmental duties, as set forth  by the competent authorities from time to time.


Satellite Communications.


Concessionaires of orbital resources, with coverage in Mexico shall establish at least, one Satellite Operations Control Center in Mexican territory, unless a force majeure event occurs, in which case, the IFT may authorize the temporary use of a Satellite Operations Control Center abroad.




Concessionaires providing terrestrial/over-the-air TV broadcasting services are obliged to allow to concessionaires of pay-TV the retransmission of their broadcasted channels. The retransmission shall be done simultaneously, free of charge, under non-discriminatory basis, within the same geographic coverage area, in full and without any modifications, including advertisement, and with the same quality than the broadcasted signal. This obligation is known as “must offer”.


Concessionaires of pay-TV services, are obliged to retransmit the terrestrial/over-the-air TV broadcasting channels, simultaneously, free of charge, under non-discriminatory basis, within the same geographic coverage area in full and without modifications, including advertisements and with the same quality than the original broadcasted signal, and to include it free of charge in their pay-TV programming. This obligation is known as “must carry”.




An Authorization is needed in order to perform any of the following activities; it is granted for a term of up to 10 years, renewable for equal periods, without limiting the times it may be renewed.


      I.        To operate and exploit the resale of telecommunications services, but without being considered a concessionaire.

     II.        To install, operate and exploit transmitting satellite earth stations.

    III.        To install telecommunications equipment and transmission means, that cross the borders of the Mexican Republic.

   IV.        To exploit the rights to transmit and to receive signals and frequency bands associated to satellite constellations with coverage within the Mexican Republic, and which are capable of providing services in the Mexican Republic.

    V.        To temporarily use frequency bands for diplomatic visits.


Reselling of Telecommunications Services


Among the activities that a reseller of telecommunications services may carry out, the FLTB provides the following:


·         Access wholesale services offered by concessionaires.

·         Resale of services and capacity previously hired to a concessionaire of public telecommunications network (i.e. Mobile Virtual Network Operators).

·         Have its own numbering resources or acquire them through concessionaires of public telecommunications networks.


The economic agents declared preponderant in the telecommunications sector, or any concessionaire part of the economic group of the preponderant, may not participate, directly or indirectly in the corporate capital of a company reseller of telecommunications services.


Public Registry of Telecommunications.


The operation of the Public Registry of Telecommunications is regulated in the FLTB. Such Registry shall be integrated by the Public Registry of Concessions and the National System of Infrastructure Information.





Collaboration with the Authorities.


Concessionaires and resellers of telecommunications services are bound to comply with any official request issued by a competent authority, within the scope of its authorities under applicable laws.


Regarding the obligation of concessionaires and resellers of telecommunications services to collaborate with authorities, the FLTB provides the following specific obligations:


·         To collaborate with public security, law enforcement and administration of justice authorities, to geographically locate in real time, mobile communication equipment.

·         To keep a record and control of the communications which are done, regardless of their type, using own or leased numbering resources.

·         To deliver the information stored to the requesting authority, according to its authorities.

·         To have a responsible area inside the company, which must be available 24x7x365 to attend any requirement of information or geographical location, and to tap private communications.

·         To block mobile telecommunications lines which are reported by the clients.




Users’ Rights.


The FLTB provides that users shall have the rights established thereunder, under the Federal Law of Consumer Protection, and under any other applicable law. Article 191 of the FLTB establishes a series of rights regarding telecommunications and broadcasting services.


Tariffs Charged to Users


The FLTB establishes obligations to the preponderant economic agent in the telecommunications sector and to the economic agent declared dominant in the market of short message services and termination calls, among other obligations.


Universal Services


Universal Services refer to the possibility of the population in general to access the telecommunications services, which will be established by the SCT, under the conditions of availability, affordability and accessibility. To provide such Universal Services, the SCT will prepare, on an annual basis, a program of social coverage and a program of connectivity in public locations.


Audiovisual Content.


Under the FLTB a series of governmental authorities are in charge of regulating broadcasted content. These are the IFT, the Ministry of Interior (Secretaría de Gobernación), the Ministry of Public Education (Secretaría de Educación Pública), the Ministry of Health (Secretaría de Salud) and the National Electoral Institute (Instituto Nacional Electoral).





Audiovisual Content


The FLTB establishes the authority of the IFT to order a precautionary suspension of the transmissions which are violating the provisions of the FLTB regarding audiences’ rights and broadcastings aimed to children




The FLTB provides the ability of broadcasting concessionaires to freely establish the fees related to advertising services. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in doing so, said concessionaires must comply with the following:


·         Advertising time of TV broadcasting concessionaires, shall not exceed eighteen percent of the total time of transmissions for each channel, and in radio stations, the advertising shall no exceed forty percent of the total time of transmissions for each radio station.


·         Advertising time for Pay-TV and restricted audio concessionaires shall not exceed 6 minutes per each hour of transmission in each channel. The channels dedicated exclusively for the offering of products, are exempted from the aforementioned limits.


Audiences Rights


The FLTB provides that the public service of broadcasting shall be provided in conditions of competence and quality, in order to satisfy Audiences’ Rights. The FLTB further establishes a list of rights which are deemed to be considered Audiences’ Rights.


Asymmetric Regulation.




The IFT is in charge of determining the economic agents that are preponderant in the sectors of telecommunications and broadcasting. The determination of the preponderant economic agents is based on having directly or indirectly more than fifty percent of national participation in the provision of broadcasting and telecommunications services. This percentage is measured by its number of users, subscribers, audience, traffic in its network or by the capacity used therein, based on the data and information that the IFT has.


The obligations of the preponderant economic agent, shall cease by an official declaration of the IFT issued in accordance to the FLTB, once there are conditions of effective competition in the relevant sector.


The FLTB in its articles 266 and 267 establishes a number of asymmetric obligations to the preponderant agents in the sectors of telecommunications and broadcasting.


Economic Agents with dominance in a relevant market.


The IFT, in accordance with the FLTB and the Federal Law on Economic Competence has also authorities to determine economic agents with dominance in a relevant market in the telecommunication and broadcasting sectors. IFT is further empowered to impose specific obligations to the dominant agents in a relevant market.


The preponderant agents in the telecommunications and broadcasting sectors may be declared dominant in a relevant market, and the IFT may impose additional and specific obligations in accordance with the FLTB.


Homologation Process.


The FLTB provides that any product, equipment or device which will be used for telecommunications or broadcasting purposes and which will be connected to a telecommunications network or that will be using radio spectrum, shall be homologated according to the applicable rules or technical standards according to the Federal Law on Metrology and Standardization (Ley Federal Sobre Metrología y Normalización).


Furthermore, it is provided that the IFT may recognize foreign homologations done to products, equipment or devices which have been evaluated as compliant by the respective country, provided that the Mexican Government has executed or signed an international treaty or agreement for such effects with such country, and that the applicant requesting the homologation procedure has a domicile in Mexico.


Verification Regime by IFT.


Public Telecommunications Network concessionaires are bound to deliver to IFT, all the information in regard to the architecture of their networks, including capacities, characteristics and location of the elements which comprise them, as well as any other information which would allow IFT to evaluate the operation and exploitation of the telecommunications and broadcasting services.


Penalties and Fines


Any breach to the provisions of the FLTB, to the administrative provisions and to the obligations contained in the concession and authorization titles, will be penalized by the IFT, and the application of the respective penalties will be carried out in accordance with the Federal Law on Administrative Procedures (Ley Federal de Procedimiento Administrativo).


Any breach to the Federal Law on Economic Competition, by any of the individuals and/or entities in the telecommunications and broadcasting sectors, will also be penalized by the IFT.


Any breach to the consumers’ rights under the FLTB, committed by any concessionaire or authorized individuals or entities, will be penalized by the Consumer Protection Agency (PROFECO for its acronym in Spanish).


The Ministry of the Interior will penalize any breach regarding contents and broadcasting of the State time according to the FLTB.


Any breach in the telecommunications and broadcasting sectors shall be penalized with fines that go from the equivalent of 0.01% to 10% of the revenues of the concessionaires or authorized persons or companies.


In the event of recidivism, the IFT may impose double the respective fine. The fines imposed by the IFT will be executed by the tax authority (SAT for its acronym in Spanish).


Furthermore, as a result of a breach, concession titles may be revoked. If this is the case, such concessionaire will be prohibited to obtain new concessions or authorizations for a term of 5 years.




IFT’s general rules, acts or omissions may only be challenged by an “amparo indirecto” process, and such process will not be subject to “suspension” (provisional measure).


The specialized courts of the Mexican Judicial Power will be the courts in charge of the processes in the telecommunications and broadcasting sectors.


In case you require additional information, please contact the partner responsible of your account or any of the following attorneys:


Mexico City office:  Jorge León-Orantes B., (Partner)       

     Carlos Díaz, (Associate)

     Phone: (52 55) 5279-5400

Monterrey office:    Jorge Barrero S., (Partner)           

     Phone: (5281) 8133-6000

Tijuana office:         Aarón Levet V., (Partner)  

    Phone: (52 664) 633-7070

Querétaro office:   José Ramón Ayala A., (Partner)        

    Phone: (52 442) 290-0290

Find a Member

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

As an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel