News & Events

Resignation -- Be Sure to Tread Carefully

Submitted By Firm: Roper Greyell LLP

Contact(s): Gregory J. Heywood, James D. Kondopulos


James D. Kondopulos

Date Published: 2/1/2013

Article Type:

Share This:

What appears to be a resignation on its face may not, at the end of the day, constitute a valid resignation. 

As illustrated in a recent decision of the B.C. Supreme Court, Haftbaradaran v. St. Hubertus Estate Winery Ltd., [2011] B.C.J. No. 1983 (S.C.), this is particularly so when the resignation is the end result of a heated and emotional exchange between the employee and his or her employer.  

Background facts

Hooman Haftbaradaran was St. Hubertus Estate Winery’s winemaker.  He was responsible for overseeing production of his employer’s wines.  

On April 7, 2010, Haftbaradaran had a heated and emotional exchange with one of St. Hubertus’ proprietors, Andy Gebert.  The meeting took place in Gebert’s office.  Haftbaradaran became emotional and agitated and complained to Gebert that in spite of the fact he worked hard for the winery, he felt undervalued and unappreciated.  

Gebert asked Haftbaradaran to leave his office but the winemaker refused to go.  Gebert became more forceful.  He said to Haftbaradaran that he was “being a pain in the ass” and told him to “get the fuck out of [his] office and go and make wine for [him]”. 

Haftbaradaran became upset and emotional.  He broke down in tears.  Gebert responded by taking a gentler tone and trying to reassure and calm Haftbaradaran.  He told the winemaker not to worry and said he would not tell anyone about the crying jag.  Haftbaradaran did not accept the reassurance and suggested that Gebert would disclose what had happened.  

At this point, Gebert, who was already frustrated and angry about being kept from his work, said that if Haftbaradaran was not prepared to take his word and was so unhappy at the winery, he should perhaps go look for another job. 

In response, Haftbaradaran took his cellar key out of his pocket and laid it on Gebert’s desk.  He made a statement, in effect, inviting Gebert to fire him.  When the winemaker was again told to get out of his superior’s office, he reached out to shake Gebert’s hand and, with a smile on his face, said words to the effect of “good luck making wine”.  Haftbaradaran then gathered his personal effects from the cellar, got in his vehicle and left the winery. 

Later in the day, after Gebert and his brother, Leo, learned that Haftbaradaran had left St. Hubertus’ property, they began to wonder if the winemaker was serious about leaving his employment. 

As an aside, an exchange similar to the one of April 7, 2010 had taken place around six months earlier between the winemaker and Leo Gebert.  Haftbaradaran had again become upset and emotional.  He had voiced a litany of complaints to Gebert and said he did not feel valued and appreciated.  Haftbaradaran had broken down in tears and turned over his cellar key, saying words to the effect of “you can do with me whatever you want”.  Notwithstanding this exchange, the winemaker continued on the job and, subsequently, regained possession of his key and managed to negotiate a pay increase.   

Returning to the events of April 7, 2010, Andy Gebert went on to send Haftbaradaran an e-mail to the following effect: 

Hi Hooman 

I just like to recap this morning’s discussion in regards of your position at our winery. 

As discussed we have to plan your departure from our company in order to clean up all the loose ends. 

We hope this should be possible within the next 4 weeks. 

Please let us know if this will work for you or if you will leave us before this time? 

Failure to respond by April 9, 2010 12:00 noon will let us to believe that you have already resigned your position at our winery. 


Haftbaradaran reacted to Gebert’s e-mail by retaining legal counsel.  In a letter to St. Hubertus, counsel said his client had been dismissed from employment and, also, had no intention of returning to work at the winery. 

A short time later, St. Hubertus paid Haftbaradaran $1,803.65 in what was characterized as severance pay.  This did not satisfy the winemaker.  He commenced legal action in B.C. Supreme Court for breach of his employment contract. 

Breach of employment contract

One of the central issues in Haftbaradaran’s case was whether he was dismissed from employment or had resigned.  

St. Hubertus’ argument was a simple one.  In its submission, Haftbaradaran had resigned and was “not … entitled to damages on any theory”. 

Mr. Justice Peter Rogers applied the following legal test to determine whether there had been a valid resignation: 

In order for an employee’s resignation to be effective, the resignation must meet the objective test of the disinterested and reasonable observer.  Would such an observer conclude from the employee’s words and actions that the employee had irrevocably quit his or her job?  Would that observer conclude that the employer had accepted the resignation as an end to their relationship? 

Mr. Justice Rogers held that the April 7, 2010 exchange between Haftbaradaran and Andy Gebert was “equivocal as it related to the issue of resignation or termination”.  The trial judge highlighted that “[d]aring Leo Gebert to fire him had worked to a limited degree … in the past”, and found that Haftbaradaran was “trying the same gambit on April 7th”.  In the view of the judge, “[q]uitting the property that day showed extremely poor judgment on [the winemaker’s] part, but a reasonable observer would see that as simply another element of his strategy”.  

Turning to Gebert’s words and actions on April 7, 2010, Mr. Justice Rogers found that they were “not intended to be and did not amount to termination of … employment”.  The trial judge found that Gebert “was entitled to instruct [Haftbaradaran] to leave his office that day” and used profanity in order to “emphasize his instruction” and get the winemaker to go back to his work.  The judge did not find Gebert’s comment to Haftbaradaran that “if he was so unhappy at St. Hubertus perhaps he should find a job somewhere else” to amount to termination of the employment contract. 

Mr. Justice Rogers, however, viewed Andy Gebert’s e-mail to Haftbaradaran in a very different light.  The trial judge found that the e-mail “change[d] the parties’ relationship” because it “spoke unequivocally of the parties’ working relationship coming to an end”.  He held: 

The e-mail made no offer of, and left no room for [Haftbaradaran] to participate in, rapprochement.  A reasonable observer, knowing what had passed between the parties earlier in the day, would have viewed the e-mail as a communication of [St. Hubertus’] decision to no longer put up with [the winemaker’s] behaviour. 

The trial judge concluded that St. Hubertus terminated Haftbaradaran’s contract of employment.  It did not have just cause to dismiss the winemaker from employment and, also, failed to provide him with appropriate notice or pay in lieu of notice.  

The judge awarded Haftbaradaran eight months of damages less the $1,803.65 he had already been paid by St. Hubertus.  This was substantial given that the winemaker had only been employed for 23 months. 

Some tips for HR professionals … 

Perhaps the most significant lesson to be learned from Haftbaradaran v. St. Hubertus Estate Winery Ltd. is that employers should not be too quick to accept what appears on its face to be a resignation.  Be sure to tread carefully.  Do not be quick to make assumptions or draw conclusions.  

Here are some additional tips: 

  1. Do not rush to accept the resignation.  Allow the employee at least a couple of days to reflect on his or her actions and a real opportunity to retract his or her resignation. 
  2. Seek written confirmation of the resignation – particularly if this is in keeping with the organization’s past practice. 
  3. Consider communicating with the employee and, if you do, document what is said.  Clarify that the employee’s words and actions were considered and deliberate and not simply the result of a hot head.   
  4. Depending on the circumstances, consider writing to the employee and explaining that you are accepting his or her resignation but also giving him or her two days to retract the resignation and return to work.

For further information, contact:
James D. Kondopulos
Partner (Practising through a law corporation)
Roper Greyell LLP

Find an Employment Lawyer

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

As an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel