News & Events

Controlled Groups and the Affordable Care Act

Submitted By Firm: Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Contact(s): Keith M. Weddington, L. Elizabeth Gibbes


Date Published: 2/20/2013

Article Type:

Share This:

Beginning January 1, 2014, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("ACA") requires employers with 50 or more full-time employees or full-time equivalents to offer full-time employees and their dependents affordable health coverage or pay a penalty. Under regulations recently proposed by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"), smaller employers also may be subject to the "pay or play" penalty under the ACA because a "controlled group" is considered a single employer for purposes of determining whether the 50-employee threshold is met. The requirements then apply to each individual employer in the group, regardless of whether the employer itself has 50 employees. These penalties may be substantial, and employers should assess their applicability when making decisions regarding health coverage for the 2014 plan year.

The information provided below briefly summarizes the requirements of the employer mandate and then discusses how these requirements apply to commonly controlled entities, such as foreign parents with subsidiaries in the United States.

Overview of Employer Mandate

IRS guidance sets forth detailed rules and safe harbors for determining the number of an employer's full-time or full-time equivalent employees. For employers with 50 or more such employees, the penalties under the ACA are calculated as follows:

Employer Provides No Coverage. If an employer does not offer minimum essential coverage to its full-time employees and at least one employee receives a premium tax credit to purchase insurance on a state exchange, the employer owes a penalty equal to the number of its full-time employees during the year, minus 30 employees, multiplied by $2,000. This penalty is prorated monthly for employers that offer coverage during some months but not others. For this purpose, an employer is treated as offering coverage to all full-time employees if it covers all but 5% of its employees, or five full-time employees, if greater. Because of the five-employee minimum, a very small employer that is part of a larger controlled group may be required to provide coverage to all of its full-time employees.

Employer Provides Coverage but at Least One Employee Receives a Premium Tax Credit. Even if an employer offers minimum essential coverage to its full-time employees, if at least one full-time employee receives a premium tax credit to purchase insurance on a state exchange, the employer is responsible for a payment equal to the number of full-time employees who received a premium tax credit for each month multiplied by 1/12 of $3,000. The payment for any calendar month is capped at the total number of full-time employees in the month, minus 30 employees, multiplied by 1/12 of $2,000. This penalty may be assessed because the coverage offered either is unaffordable or does not provide minimum value.

Note that whether an employer has 50 or more employees is determined based on both full-time employees (those who work at least 30 hours per week) and full-time equivalent employees (those who work less than 30 hours per week and whose hours are added together to determine full-time equivalents), but the penalties are calculated based only on the number of full-time employees. The 30-employee exclusion is allocated pro rata among the members of a controlled group based on the number of full-time employees of each. The penalties are not paid automatically by an employer but rather are assessed by the IRS after the end of the year.

Controlled Group Rules

Under §414(c) of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code"), a controlled group exists when any two or more entities are connected through ownership in a parent-subsidiary controlled group, a brother-sister controlled group, or a combination of the foregoing. Any type of business entity can be a member of a controlled group for benefit plan purposes, for example, a corporation, partnership, sole proprietorship or limited liability company. There generally are three types of controlled groups:

A "parent-subsidiary" controlled group exists when a parent company directly or indirectly owns 80% of a subsidiary organization;

A "brother-sister" controlled group exists where the same five or fewer persons own more than 80% of two or more other entities and own more than 50% when taking into account the ownership of each person only to the extent that it is identical with respect to each such entity; and

A "combined" controlled group exists where a group includes both parent-subsidiary and brother-sister members.

Companies that are part of the same controlled group generally must be combined for the purpose of determining whether they collectively employ 50 or more full-time or full-time equivalent employees under the ACA. Where the combined total of full-time or full-time equivalent employees in a controlled group is at least 50, each individual employer is subject to the employer mandate, even if such employer itself does not employ enough employees to meet the threshold.

These rules apply for purposes of determining whether an employer meets the 50 full-time employee threshold, regardless of whether the parent or owner is located in the United States. For example, a foreign-based company with several subsidiaries in the United States must aggregate the employees of the parent and all subsidiaries who work in the United States for purposes of complying with the ACA. This requirement may be problematic for foreign-owned subsidiaries operating in separate lines of business that may or may not know of the existence of the other related companies because of the pro rata allocation of the 30-employee exclusion and required coverage of all but 5% of employees, or five full-time employees, if greater.

Failure of employers to adequately assess their exposure under the ACA and assess whether they may be subject to the "pay or play" penalties as members of a controlled group could potentially result in significant penalties. In addition, the IRS has warned that it is planning to put in place anti-abuse rules with additional penalties to discourage employers from attempting to evade penalties through regulatory loopholes. It is also possible that individual directors and executives could be held personally liable for failure to comply with the mandate, although further guidance on this issue from the IRS is necessary.

If you have questions about the ACA, application of the controlled group rules or any other employee benefits matter, please contact Charlotte Offerdahl at 336.994.6395 or Katie Iams at 704.335.6640.

For more information on Parker Poe’s Employment & Employee Benefits practice, please click here.

Find an Employment Lawyer

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

As an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel