News & Publications

New Fee Disclosure Requirements Under ERISA Section 408(b)(2)

Submitted By Firm: Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP

Contact(s): Michael Porter, Susan Stahlfeld


Date Published: 3/21/2012

Article Type:

Share This:

The U.S. Department of Labor (the “DOL”) has issued final regulations that will impose new fee disclosure requirements on certain persons who provide services to ERISA-covered pension plans (e.g., ERISA-covered defined benefit plans, 401(k) plans, profit sharing plans, and most 403(b) plans). The regulations’ disclosure requirements do not apply to welfare plans.

Generally, ERISA prohibits a service provider from providing services to a plan. ERISA Section 408(b)(2) provides a statutory exemption to this prohibition, permitting a service provider to provide services to a plan if, among other requirements, the service contract is reasonable. Beginning July 1, 2012, a contract between a plan and a covered service provider will not be “reasonable” for purposes of ERISA Section 408(b)(2) unless the service provider discloses certain compensation information to plan fiduciaries. The primary purpose of the new regulations is to ensure that plan fiduciaries are provided with the information they need to select and monitor service providers and assess the reasonableness of service contracts, including the reasonableness of service providers’ compensation and any potential conflicts of interest. The new regulations are part of a broader initiative by the DOL to increase the transparency of fee arrangements between plans and service providers.

Existing and new contracts with covered service providers must comply with the new regulations by July 1, 2012.

The disclosure requirements apply to “covered service providers” that expect to receive compensation of $1,000 or more in connection with providing services to a plan. A “covered service provider” is a person or entity that provides one of the following:

  • Services as a registered investment adviser or as an ERISA fiduciary, including in connection with an investment contract, product, or entity that holds plan assets and in which a plan has a direct equity investment. (This does not include managers of mutual funds.)
  • Recordkeeping or brokerage services for plans that have participant-directed investments if one or more designated investment alternatives will be made available in connection with such services.
  • The following services, if the service provider expects to receive indirect compensation or certain payments from related parties: accounting, auditing, actuarial, appraisal, banking, consulting (with respect to investment policies or the selection or monitoring of service providers or plan investments), custodial, insurance, investment advisory, legal, recordkeeping, securities or other investment brokerage, third party administration, or valuation. “Indirect compensation” is compensation received from any source other than the plan, the plan sponsor, the service provider, or an affiliate of the service provider. “Certain payments from related parties” is discussed in the fifth bullet point in the following section. A “related party” is the covered service provider’s affiliate or subcontractor.

Covered service providers must provide plan fiduciaries with the following information, in writing, reasonably in advance of the date the services contract is entered into, extended, or renewed.

  • A description of the services to be provided to the plan.
  • If applicable, a statement that the covered service provider or a related party will provide services directly to the plan as a fiduciary or as a registered investment adviser.
  • A description of all direct compensation, either in the aggregate or by service, that the covered service provider or a related party expects to receive in connection with its services to the plan. “Direct compensation” is compensation paid by the plan.
  • A description of all indirect compensation that the covered service provider or a related party expects to receive in connection with its services to the plan. This disclosure must include the identification of the services for which the indirect compensation will be received and the payer of the compensation, and a description of the arrangement between the payer and the recipient under which the indirect compensation is paid.
  • A description of any compensation that will be paid among the covered service provider or a related party in connection with services to the plan if the compensation is either (a) set on a transaction basis (e.g., commissions, soft dollars, finder’s fees) or (b) charged directly against the plan’s investment and reflected in the investment’s net value (e.g., 12b-1 fees). The covered service provider must identify the services for which such compensation will be paid as well as the payers and recipients of such compensation. This information must be separately disclosed even if it was also disclosed as direct or indirect compensation.
  • A description of any compensation that the covered service provider or a related party expects to receive in connection with termination of the contract, and how any prepaid amounts will be calculated and refunded upon the termination.
  • If recordkeeping services will be provided, a description of all direct and indirect compensation that the covered service provider or a related party expects to receive in connection with those recordkeeping services. If the compensation for recordkeeping services is not explicit or is rebated based on other compensation, then the covered service provider must furnish a reasonable good faith estimate of the cost of the services (including an explanation of the methodology and assumptions used).
  • Additional investment-related disclosures if the covered service provider either (a) is a fiduciary in connection with an investment contract, product, or entity that holds plan assets and in which a plan has a direct equity investment, or (b) provides recordkeeping or brokerage services to a plan that has participant-directed investments and one or more designated investment alternatives will be made available in connection with those services. The additional investment-related disclosures include a description of any compensation that will be charged directly against an investment (and that is not included in the annual operating expenses), the annual operating expense if the return is not fixed and any additional ongoing expenses (or, for a designated investment alternative, the total annual operating expenses), and any other information about designated investment alternatives that the plan must disclose to participants.
  • A description of the manner in which compensation will be received (e.g., whether the plan will be billed or the compensation will be deducted directly from the plan accounts or investments).

The requirement that the disclosures be in advance of the contract date is subject to certain exceptions (for example, when an investment does not initially, but does subsequently, hold plan assets). Generally, covered service providers must disclose any change to the information initially provided. Disclosures of changes to investment-related information must be provided at least annually. Changes to any other required disclosures must be disclosed as soon as practicable, but not later than 60 days after the date on which the service provider is informed of the change.

A covered service provider must also, upon written request, provide plan fiduciaries with any other information required for the plan to comply with ERISA’s reporting and disclosure requirements. Such information must be disclosed reasonably in advance of the date on which the plan fiduciary states that the plan must comply with the applicable requirement.

Failure to comply with the new disclosure requirements will result in the plan fiduciary’s and the covered service provider’s engaging in a prohibited transaction.

There are, however, a couple of exceptions to this rule. First, contracts will not fail to be reasonable under the new regulations solely because the covered service provider, acting in good faith and with reasonable diligence, makes an error or omission in disclosing the required information. This exception applies provided that the covered service provider makes the required disclosure as soon as practicable, but not later than 30 days after discovering the error or omission.

Additionally, if a required disclosure is not provided, a plan fiduciary will not have engaged in a prohibited transaction if the following conditions are satisfied:

  • The fiduciary did not know of the failure and reasonably believed that the required information had been disclosed.
  • Upon discovering the failure, the fiduciary requests the information in writing from the covered service provider.
  • If the covered service provider fails to provide the information within 90 days, the fiduciary notifies the DOL of the failure within 30 days of the expiration of the 90-day period or, if earlier, of the service provider’s refusal to provide the information. (A model fee disclosure failure notice is available at:
  • If the covered service provider fails to provide the information within 90 days, the fiduciary determines whether to terminate the contract. If the requested information relates to future services and is not disclosed promptly after the end of the 90-day period, then the plan fiduciary must terminate the contract as expeditiously as possible, consistent with his or her duty of prudence.

Plan fiduciaries must be proactive in obtaining the required disclosures by July 1, 2012.

Plan fiduciaries must obtain the disclosures from all covered service providers (even those with existing contracts). Plan fiduciaries should perform the following steps to ensure that they receive the required information.

  • Identify all covered plans and covered service providers.
  • Contact all covered service providers, in writing, and ask when the required disclosures will be made. Ask that the disclosures be made as soon as possible, but no later than a specified date before July 1, 2012 (such date should give the fiduciary sufficient time to review the disclosures).
  • Review the disclosures. Compare the disclosures to the requirements in the regulations. (In order to qualify for relief from the prohibited transaction rules if a required disclosure is not made, fiduciaries must reasonably believe that the required disclosures have been made. Thus, the disclosures must be reviewed.)
  • Determine whether the required disclosures have been made. If a fiduciary does not think that all the required disclosures have been made, contact the covered service providers in writing, and request that the disclosures be made.
  •  Determine whether the contract and the compensation paid to each covered service provider are reasonable.

Find an Employment Lawyer

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

As an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel