News & Publications

New Fee Disclosure Requirements for Plans With Participant-Directed Investments

Submitted By Firm: Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP

Contact(s): Michael Porter, Susan Stahlfeld


Date Published: 4/27/2012

Article Type:

Share This:

The Department of Labor (the “DOL”) has issued final regulations that will require fiduciaries of individual account plans with participant-directed investments to periodically disclose to participants certain plan and investment-related information. For calendar-year plans, the initial disclosures are required by August 30, 2012. The purpose of this new disclosure requirement is to ensure that participants receive sufficient information regarding the plan and its investment options to make informed decisions regarding the investment of their accounts.

A. Who Must Disclose.

        The plan administrator is responsible for complying with this new disclosure requirement, although the plan administrator may delegate this duty to a service provider (e.g., investment manager or third-party administrator). The plan administrator will probably not have in its possession all the required information and will need to obtain that information from service providers. Recognizing that plan administrators will need to use information prepared by third parties, the regulations provide that a plan administrator will not be liable for the completeness and accuracy of the disclosed information so long as the plan administrator reasonably and in good faith relies on the information received from a service provider or investment issuer.

B. Who Must Receive the Disclosure.

        The plan administrator must disclose the required information to all plan participants and beneficiaries. The term “participant” includes employees who are eligible to participate under the terms of the plan but are not actually enrolled in the plan. The term “beneficiary” means only those beneficiaries who have accounts in the plan and a right to direct the investment of their accounts (e.g., an alternate payee under a QDRO or the beneficiary of a deceased participant). (For purposes of this article, a reference to “participants” includes beneficiaries who have plan accounts.)

C. Which Plans Are Subject to the Disclosure Requirement.

        The disclosure requirement applies to ERISA-covered individual account plans with participant-directed investments. The disclosure requirement applies regardless of the number of participants, and regardless of whether or not the plan is attempting to comply with ERISA Section 404(c). The disclosure requirement does not apply to SEPs or SIMPLE IRAs.

D. What Information Must Be Disclosed.

        Plan administrators are required to disclose two categories of information: (1) plan-related information, and (2) investment-related information.

    1. Plan-Related Information.

       The plan administrator must disclose the following plan-related information on or before the date on which a participant can first direct the investment of his or her accounts (the “initial disclosure”) and at least annually thereafter (the “annual disclosure”). (All the information described in this article must be included in the initial and annual disclosures, except that certain information described in (b) and (c) below must be disclosed on a quarterly basis.)

        a. General Information. This includes:

  • an explanation of the circumstances under which participants may give investment instructions;
  • an explanation of any limitations on investment instructions, including restrictions on transferring to or from a designated investment option;
  • a description of plan provisions relating to the exercise of voting, tender, and other rights in a designated investment option
  • identification of the designated investment options
  • identification of any designated investment managers; and
  • a description of any brokerage windows or self-directed brokerage accounts that enable participants to select investments other than the designated investment options.

        b. Administrative Expenses. The initial and annual disclosures must include an explanation of any fees and expenses related to general plan administrative services (e.g., recordkeeping, accounting, legal) that may be charged against a participant’s account and are not reflected in the total annual operating expenses of the designated investment options. The disclosures must also include the basis on which such charges will be allocated to each account (e.g., pro rata, per capita).

        In addition to the initial and annual disclosures, the plan administrator must provide a quarterly statement that shows the dollar amount of fees and expenses actually charged against a participant’s account in the preceding quarter and a description of the services that relate to those charges. If applicable, the quarterly disclosure must also include an explanation that, in addition to the expenses reported on the statement, some of the plan’s administrative expenses were paid from the annual operating expenses of one or more of the plan’s designated investment options (such as through revenue-sharing arrangements, 12b-1 fees, or sub-transfer agent fees).

        c. Individual Expenses. The initial and annual disclosures must include an explanation of the fees and expenses that may be charged against a participant’s account on an individual, rather than on a plan-wide, basis that are not included in the total annual operating expenses of any designated investment option. Such charges include fees for processing loans or QDROs, fees for investment advice, brokerage window fees, front- or back-end loads or sales charges, and redemption fees.

        In addition, the plan administrator must furnish a quarterly statement disclosing the dollar amount of any fees and expenses actually charged against a participant’s account in the preceding quarter and a description of the services relating to those charges.

        d. Changes to Plan-Related Information. If there is any change to the plan-related information listed in (a) through (c) above, each participant must receive a description of the change at least 30 days but not more than 90 days before the effective date of the change. This rule does not apply to plan-related information disclosed on a quarterly basis.

    2. Investment-Related Information.

        The plan administrator must include the following investment-related information in the initial and annual disclosures:

        a. Identifying Information. The disclosure must include the name of each designated investment option and the type of investment (e.g., money market fund, balanced fund).

        b. Performance Data. For designated investment options with variable returns, the disclosure must include the investment’s performance for one-, five-, and ten-calendar year periods (or for the life of the investment, if shorter), along with a statement indicating that past performance is not indicative of future performance.

        For designated investment options with a fixed or stated return, such as certificates of deposit and guaranteed insurance contracts, the disclosure must include the fixed or stated annual rate of return and the term of the investment. If the fixed or stated rate of return can be adjusted prospectively, the plan administrator must disclose the current rate of return, the minimum guaranteed rate, if any, a statement that the rate of return may be adjusted prospectively, and an explanation of how to obtain the most recent information on the rate of return.

        c. Benchmarks. For designated investment options with variable returns, the disclosure must include the name and returns of an appropriate broad-based securities market index over one-, five-, and ten-calendar year periods (or for the life of the investment, if shorter). The plan administrator should not use an index administered by an affiliate of the investment issuer, its investment adviser, or a principal underwriter, unless the index is widely recognized and used.

        d. Fee and Expense Information. The disclosure must include the fee amount and a description of each shareholder-type fee charged directly against a participant’s investment. A shareholder-type fee is any fee that is not included in the total annual operating expense, such as a commission, sales load, sales or surrender charge, or redemption, exchange, or purchase fee. The disclosure must also describe any restrictions concerning the designated investment option, such as trading restrictions or limitations on how amounts liquidated from the investment may be reinvested.

        For designated investment options with variable returns, the disclosure must also include:

  • the total annual operating expense expressed as a percentage (i.e., the expense ratio) and the total annual operating expense for a one-year period expressed as a dollar amount for a $1,000 investment;
  • a statement indicating that fees and expenses are only one of several factors that should be considered when making investment decisions; and
  • a statement indicating that the cumulative effect of fees and expenses can substantially reduce the growth of an account and that an example demonstrating the long-term effect of fees and expenses can be found on the DOL’s website.

        e. Internet Website Address. The disclosure must include an Internet website address that provides access to the names of the investment issuers, a general description of the types of assets held by the investments, and the investments’ objectives, principal strategies, attendant risks, portfolio turnover rates, performances (updated at least quarterly), and fees and expenses.

        The plan administrator is responsible for maintaining the website and making it available to participants. If the plan administrator delegates its website responsibilities to a service provider, the plan administrator will not be liable for the completeness and accuracy of the information on the website to the extent that it reasonably and in good faith relies on information provided by the service provider.

        f. Glossary. To assist participants in understanding the designated investment options, the plan administrator must provide a general glossary of relevant terms. The glossary may be furnished with the required disclosures or made available on the website. 

        g. Annuity Options and Employer Securities. If participants are permitted to allocate their accounts toward the future purchase of an annuity, the disclosure does not need to include the information in (a) through (e) above. Instead, the disclosure must include information about the annuity option, including the name of the contract, a description of its objectives, the factors that determine the price of the guaranteed payments, any limitations on the ability to withdraw or transfer amounts allocated to the option and any fees applicable to withdrawals or transfers, any fees that will reduce the value of amounts allocated to the option, a statement that guarantees of an insurance company are subject to its long-term financial strength and claims-paying ability, and a website address that provides access to information about the annuity option. 

        If a designated investment option consists of qualifying employer securities, the disclosure must include, in lieu of the explanation of the investment’s principal strategies and risks in (e) above, an explanation of the importance of a well-balanced and diversified portfolio. Additionally, the requirements relating to fee and expense information and total annual operating expenses do not apply unless the qualifying employer security option is a fund with respect to which participants acquire units of participation, rather than actual shares. The disclosure also does not need to include information about portfolio turnover rate.

        h. Comparative Format Requirement. The investment-related information described in (a) through (g) above must be furnished in a chart that is designed to facilitate a comparison of each designated investment option. The chart must include the date of the chart, the name, address, and telephone number of the plan administrator, the website address, and a statement explaining how to obtain paper copies of the information on the website. 

        The regulations include a model comparative chart, which is available at

        i. Additional Disclosures. After participants have invested in a designated investment option, the plan administrator must provide them with any materials that the plan receives with respect to the exercise of voting, tender, and similar rights to the extent that those rights are passed through to participants under the terms of the plan. 

        Additionally, the plan administrator must provide to each participant upon request (or automatically with the initial and annual disclosures) certain investment-related information, including prospectuses, financial statements, a statement of an investment share’s value and valuation date, and a list and value of the assets in each designated investment option that constitute plan assets under ERISA.

E. When to Disclose

        The DOL aligned the date on which the first initial disclosure must be provided with the effective date of the new fee disclosure requirements under ERISA Section 408(b)(2) (for more details about the 408(b)(2) fee disclosure requirements, see The first initial disclosure must be furnished no later than August 30, 2012 (or, if later, no later than 60 days after the first day of the first plan year beginning on or after November 1, 2011). Thus, for calendar-year plans, the first initial disclosure must be made by August 30, 2012. Subsequently, plan administrators must disclose plan-related and investment-related information on or before the date that the participant can first direct the investment of his or her accounts and at least annually thereafter. The initial and annual disclosures may be provided as part of the summary plan description or quarterly benefit statements, as long as these documents are furnished at the appropriate times. The initial and annual disclosures may also be provided as a stand-alone document.

        Plan-related expenses that are actually charged to participants must be disclosed on a quarterly basis and may be provided with quarterly benefit statements. The first quarterly disclosure must be furnished no later than 45 days after the end of the quarter in which the first initial disclosures are required to be furnished (e.g., by November 14, 2012, for calendar-year plans).

F. Action Items.

        Before the deadline for the first initial disclosure (i.e., August 30, 2012, for most plans), plan administrators need to contact the appropriate service provider to determine who will be preparing and distributing the disclosures. Plan administrators who will prepare the disclosures themselves should start gathering the required information and requesting investment-related information from issuers as early as possible to ensure timely compliance with the new regulations. If a service provider will be preparing the disclosures, the plan administrator should carefully review the information prepared by the service provider to make sure that it satisfies the regulations. It is possible that a service provider will prepare some, but not all, of the disclosures. In that case, the plan administrator must determine which part of the disclosures the plan administrator will be responsible for preparing and begin to prepare the applicable disclosures.

        The participant-level fee disclosure regulations can be found at

Find an Employment Lawyer

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

As an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel