News & Events

China: Draft Labor Dispatch Regulations Issued

Submitted By Firm: Jun He

Contact(s): Jeffrey Wilson


Date Published: 8/20/2013

Article Type:

Share This:

China took steps to standardize labor dispatch with the issuance of the draft Labor Dispatch Regulations (the Draft Regulations) on August 7, 2013. These regulations, if implemented, would significantly restrict the use of dispatched employees by companies.

The Draft Regulations were issued by the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security (MOHRSS) and are intended to implement provisions regarding labor dispatch in the recently amended Labor Contract Law (LCL). The MOHRSS is soliciting comments on the Draft Regulations until September 7, 2013.

The key points of the Draft Regulations are as follows:

  • Definition of Labor Dispatch

The Draft Regulations defines labor dispatch as a type of business when an employer seconds employees to a host entity that directly manages the dispatched employees.

If a host entity engages a vendor to provide a service through the vendor’s employees, the arrangement would be deemed labor dispatch if the host entity directly manages the vendor’s employees. Thus, under the Draft Regulations, the key factor to distinguish outsourcing and labor dispatch is whether the service provider or the host entity manages the work of the employees.

The Draft Regulations further provide that assignments of employees to engage in work for affiliates, overseas assignments, and assignment of domestic workers are not considered labor dispatch.

  • Determination of Auxiliary Positions and Cap on Auxiliary Positions

The LCL limits labor dispatch to temporary, auxiliary and substitute positions (Qualified Positions). The LCL defines an auxiliary position as a position that is not engaged in the principal business of the employer. The Draft Regulations details how auxiliary positions are determined.

If a host entity wants to use dispatch employees for auxiliary positions, the Draft Regulations require the host entity to prepare a list of proposed auxiliary positions. The host entity must then discuss the list of proposed positions with the host entity’s labor union or employee representative congress. Finally, the host entity must publicize the list of auxiliary positions to all employees.

The LCL provides that a limit on the number of dispatched employees that a host entity may use will be announced. The Draft Regulations implement this requirement, however only in respect to auxiliary positions. The Draft Regulations state that the cap on auxiliary workers is 10% of the combined number of dispatched employees in auxiliary positions and directly‐employed employees of the host entity. The number of dispatched employees in temporary or substitute positions is not included in the calculation.

  • Labor Agency and Host Entity Obligations for Dispatched Employee Labor Contracts

The Draft Regulations provide that dispatched employees and labor agencies may enter into open‐term labor contracts. The Draft Regulations, however, are silent whether labor agencies must comply with the LCL requirement to provide open‐term labor contracts after dispatched employees have completed two fixed‐term labor contracts.

The Draft Regulations state that a labor agency may subject a dispatched employee to only one probation period. Thus, in practice, a dispatched employee who is dispatched to a second host entity may not be made subject to a probation period at the second host entity.

In addition, the Draft Regulations emphasize the host entity’s obligation to verify that dispatched employees have signed labor contracts with labor agencies. The host entity will be deemed as the direct employer of dispatched employees who do not sign labor contracts with their labor agencies.

  • Conditions for Return and Termination of Dispatched Employees

The LCL provides situations (e.g., employee gross misconduct, incompetence, or exhaustion of medical treatment period) when a host entity may return a dispatched employee to a labor agency and the labor agency can terminate the dispatched employee.

The Draft Regulations expand upon the LCL provisions to clarify the grounds when a dispatched employee may be returned to a labor agency by the host entity but not terminated by the labor agency. These grounds include:

  • The dispatched employee is returned based on Articles 40(3) or 41 of the LCL (i.e., change in “objective circumstances” and mass layoffs, respectively);
  • The dispatched employee is returned due to conditions affecting the host entity generally corresponding to Articles 44(4) or 44(5) of the LCL (i.e., bankruptcy, revocation of business license, being ordered to close down the business, liquidation, or expiration of the labor dispatch service agreement);
  • The dispatched employee is returned because (i) the dispatched employee is not working in a Qualified Position, or (ii) the dispatched employee has an auxiliary position and the host entity has exceeded the 10% cap of dispatched employees in auxiliary positions.

If a dispatched employee is returned under any of these grounds, the labor agency must reassign the employee to another host entity. The labor agency must pay the dispatched employee at least the local minimum wage when the employee is not dispatched.

The Draft Regulations further provide that a labor agency is entitled to terminate the labor contract of a returned dispatched employee if the labor agency maintains or improves the terms of a dispatched employee’s labor contract and the dispatched employee refuses a re‐assignment.

  • Labor Standard Requirements for Employees Dispatched to Other Jurisdictions

Labor standards (e.g., minimum wage) for dispatched employees must comply with the standards where the host entity is registered. This principle also applies to an employee who is assigned to a host entity that is located in a different province or city than where the labor agency is registered. However, a labor agency and a dispatched employee may agree to use the standards applicable in the jurisdiction where the labor agency is registered if those standards are higher.

In regards to social insurance contributions for employees dispatched to work in other provinces or cities, the Draft Regulations provide that if the labor agency has a branch or subsidiary in the jurisdiction where the host entity is located, the branch or subsidiary must make social insurance contributions for the dispatched employees in the host entity’s location. If the labor agency has no branch or subsidiary in the host entity’s location, social insurance contributions for dispatched employees must still be made where the labor agency is registered, and the labor agency may not entrust third parties to make social insurance contributions for the dispatched employees.

  • Legal Sanctions for Violations

If a host entity uses dispatched employees in positions that are not Qualified Positions, or when the 10% cap on auxiliary positions is exceeded, the host entity may be ordered by the labor bureau to make a “correction” within a stipulated period. The correction is understood to be either hiring the dispatched employees directly or returning them to the labor agency. The Draft Regulations provide that if the dispatched employees state in writing that they are unwilling to be direct employees of the host entity, the only means of a host entity making a correction would be to return the dispatched employees.

If the host entity fails to make a correction within the stipulated period, the host entity may be subject to a fine. If the host entity fails to make a correction within one month after a fine is imposed, the dispatched employees will be deemed to be direct hires. The employment relationship between the host entity and the dispatched employees will be deemed to have been established one month after the host entity was fined. The Draft Regulations are silent on the contract term of employees deemed to be direct hires of a host entity.

  • Adjustment of Transitional Provisions

According to the LCL, labor contracts for dispatched employees and labor dispatch agreements entered into before December 28, 2012 are generally grandfathered from LCL requirements until the expiration of the contracts. The Draft Regulations extend such treatment to labor contracts and labor dispatch agreements entered into before July 1, 2013.

  • Applicability to Representative Offices

The Draft Regulations clarify that representative offices of foreign companies, foreign financial institutions, foreign diplomatic offices, foreign media offices and representative offices of the United Nations that are required under law to use dispatched employees are not subject to the provisions regarding Qualified Positions, the 10% cap on dispatched employees with auxiliary positions, or deemed direct employment. The Draft Regulations indicate that all other provisions regarding dispatched employees would apply to these offices.

Find an Employment Lawyer

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

As an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel