News & Events

Work & Secuirty Act: What to Take Note of Now

Submitted By Firm: Boekel

Contact(s): Epke Spijkerman


Hester Uhlenbroek and Afra Pepping

Date Published: 3/7/2014

Article Type:

Share This:

On 18 February 2014 the Dutch House of Representatives adopted the legislative proposal for the Work &  Security Act by a large majority. The Dutch Senate will review the bill in the coming months. Assuming that the Senate also lends its approval, part of the new act will take effect as of 1 July of this year. In this newsflash we will discuss the changes that you need to be alert to from now on.

This act alters the rules that apply to flexible employment, law of dismissal and to the Unemployment Benefits Act. The legislature intended to introduce the changes to these three areas at different times: 1 July 2014 (flexible employment), 1 July 2015 (dismissal law) and 1 January 2016 (unemployment benefits). An important change has been made to this schedule: the House of Representatives decided that adjustments to the provisions on successive fixed-term employment contracts  (which stipulate when the last temporary contract in a succession of contracts will be converted into a permanent contract) will not take effect from 1 July 2014, but one year later: 1 July 2015. The other adjustments in relation to flexible employment will take effect from 1 July 2014. It is important to bear in mind whether the amended rules will immediately affect existing employment contracts, or whether they will only apply to contracts concluded after 1 July 2014.

Obligation to notify intention to terminate / continue a temporary employment contract

The act will place a new obligation on employers: if an employer has concluded a temporary contract with an employee with a term of six months or more, then at least one month before the contract ends, the employer must notify the employee in writing of (i) whether or not the contract will be continued and if so, (ii) on what conditions. The obligation also applies to successive temporary contracts with terms of six months or more. Please note: this obligation will apply to temporary employment contracts that terminate one month or later after this part of the new act takes effect, i.e. from 1 August 2014. This means that the obligation to notify temporary staff will apply to almost all temporary employment contracts concluded before 1 July 2014. 

There are sanctions for employers if they do not comply, do not comply on time or do not completely comply with the obligation to notify temporary employees:

  • if an employer has failed in any way to inform an employee as to whether it intends to continue the contract (see (i) above), then it must pay the employee one month’s salary;
  • if an employer is late in informing the employee, i.e. less than one month before the contract ends (see (i) above), then for every day that the employer fails to inform the employee, it must pay the employee one day’s salary;
  • if the contract is continued but the employer has not fully complied with the obligation to notify (in cases (i) or (ii) above), then the contract will be continued for another period of the same length (however, no more than one year) on the same terms. If an employer wishes to continue an employment contract on different terms, it must therefore be sure to inform the employee in good time.

The obligation to notify does not apply to temporary employment contracts that do not include a fixed end date of employment (e.g. temporary replacement in the event of illness).

Trial period clause

From 1 July 2014, a trial period clause in employment contracts with a term of six months or less is null and void. This applies to contracts concluded on 1 July 2014 or later, but not to contracts that were already in effect before 1 July 2014. Please note: this rule also applies to successive contracts for the same job and to successive employment relationships – for example, if an employer itself goes on to employ an employee who initially did the same work but who had been seconded by a temporary staffing agency.

Non-competition clause

Temporary employment contracts concluded on or after 1 July 2014 may no longer include a non-competition clause, unless it is necessary on account of compelling  business interests. Non-competition clauses in temporary contracts that are already in force on 1 July 2014 will therefore continue to apply.

If an employer wishes to include a non-competition clause in a temporary contract after 1 July 2014, it must cite the interests involved in writing and explain why they make a non-competition clause necessary. According to the Explanatory Memorandum to the bill, the interests must relate to temporary and specific duties or specific positions in which the benefits to the employer of including the non-competition clause outweigh the drawbacks for the employee. However, the government has not given any specific examples of such compelling interests.

The non-competition clause will have to comply with these conditions both when it is agreed and when the employer wishes to invoke it.

According to the new regulation, a non-competition clause in a temporary contract can be void or voidable in three situations:

  • if no reasons are stated, the clause is void;
  • if, according to the court, the clause is not necessary in view of the interests stated by the employer, the court will annul the clause in full;
  • if, according to the court, the non-competition clause is too detrimental to the employee compared to the interest of the employer in retaining it, the court will annul the clause in full or in part.

In the debate on the bill, the business relations clause has thus far not come up. Because courts view a business relations clause as a form of non-competition clause, it seems advisable to state your reasons for it in the same way as for the non-competition clause.

Obligation to continue to pay salary

Employees are entitled to payment of salary, even if they have not done their work in full or in part. This is not the case if, in reasonableness, not having done the work is the responsibility of the employee, for example, because he or she participated in a strike, came to work late or was imprisoned. Under the present law, there is no limit to the departures that may be made from this obligation by collective agreement, for example in the case of on-call contracts. Collective agreements that take effect after 1 July 2014 may depart from this obligation, without restrictions, only for specific jobs designated in the collective agreement that are non-recurrent and do not have a fixed scope, such as jobs for which use is made of stand-in workers. Arrangements in collective agreements that are already in force on 1 July 2014 will continue to apply on this aspect for the remaining term, but only up to a maximum of 18 months.

Temporary employment relationships

The new act contains specific rules for temporary employment agencies. The obligation to notify as described above will not apply if a temporary employment clause is in effect between the temporary worker and the agency. Restrictions will come to apply to the periods for which agencies can apply a temporary employment clause, exclude the applicability of provisions on successive fixed-term contracts or depart from the obligation to continue to pay salary. If a collective agreement takes effect after 1 July 2014, the statutory term for such deviations can be extended from 26 weeks to a maximum of 78 weeks. Under the new legislation, departing from the obligation to continue to pay salary is not limited to non-recurrent jobs without a fixed scope. Arrangements in collective agreements that are already in force on 1 July 2014 will continue to apply on these aspects for the remaining term, but only up to a maximum of 18 months.

In calculating the period in which the temporary employment clause applies or in which the provisions for successive fixed-term employment contracts can be excluded, after 1 July 2014 the weeks during which temporary staff work will be added together if the weeks of work are interrupted by a maximum of six months. Up to now, they were added together when interrupted by periods of up to one year.


It is wise to give some thought now to the new rules, which in all probability will apply from 1 July 2014. It is a good idea to mark down the date by which you need to notify temporary employees of whether their contract will be continued and to check whether new contracts comply with the trial period clause and the non-competition clause. Employers subject to a collective agreement that has made departures from the obligation to continue to pay salary will have to check the new collective agreement.

Find a Member

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

As an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel