News & Events

Croatia: termination of employment due to operational needs

Submitted By Firm: Vidan Law Office

Contact(s): Hrvoje Vidan


Hrvoje Vidan

Date Published: 10/29/2013

Article Type:

Share This:

1. Introduction

The issue of terminating employment contract due to operational needs of employer is one of the most intriguing issues in the employment law, which enables the flexibility of the employment and adapting the business to the new demands on the market and the economic situation in the company. Due to long lasting economic crisis this institute has gained on importance and is being extensively exercised by the employers. Yet, in order for the termination to be valid one should take into consideration a number of restricting provisions and the even more important court practice.

According to Art.104 of the Croatian Labour Act (Official Gazette Nu. 149/09, 61/11 and 82/12, hereinafter “LA”) the employment contract may be terminated in a number of cases. The grounds for dismissal are: i) the death of the employee; ii) expiration of the fixed-term employment contract; iii) reaching by the employee 65 years of age and 15 years of insurance period; iv) agreement on termination; v) delivery of legally effective decision on retirement due to general inability to work; vi) dismissal; and vii) decision of the court.

2. Regular notice and extraordinary notice

The LA does not provide for the definition of a dismissal. Dismissal of the employment contract is unilateral statement (notice) of a party to the employment contract declaring the termination of employment. Each party to employment is entitled to give a notice on dismissal (Art. 106 of the LA). Generally, the LA divides dismissals on regular and irregular.

Both, the employer and the employee are entitled to "extraordinary notice", if due to especially grave violation of employment obligation or due to any other highly important fact, considering all the circumstances and mutual interests, the continuation of the employment is no longer possible. In case of extraordinary dismissal, the parties are not obliged to respect agreed or statutory notice period.

As opposed to extraordinary notice, the parties to employment are also entitled to terminate employment by respecting the agreed or statutory notice period (regular notice). The employer may give notice in the following cases:

  • due to operational reasons (if a need for performing certain work ceased due to economic, technological or organisational reasons);
  • due to personal reasons (if the employee is not capable of fulfilling her/his employment-related duties because of some permanent characteristics or abilities); or
  • due to the employee's misconduct (if the employee violates employment obligation).

Whereas in any of the above cases the employer must have a justified reason for termination the employee is entitled to terminate employment without specifying particular reason. As a rule, the employee shall respect the statutory or agreed notice period but there is a limitation of a notice period to maximum one month if there is a justified reason for that.

3. Requirements for notice due to operational reasons

When deciding on notice due to operational reasons, there are number of restrictions to be applied. The notice due to operational reasons may be given if:

  • the employer is unable to assign the employee the alternative job;
  • the social criteria such as the length of service, age, disability, support obligations of the employee justify termination of employment of that particular employee;
  • the employer cannot train or qualify the employee for a work at another job position or if the circumstances does not require from the employer training or qualifying the employee for a work at another job position.

These requirements shall however apply only to the employers employing more than twenty employees.

4. Prevention of abuse

In order to prevent abuse of the employee’s rights, the employer who has given notice to the employee due to economic, technological or organisational reasons is not allowed to employ another employee on the same job within the next six months following the notice (Art. 107 par. 7 of the LA). If within this period, a need for employment of another employee for the same job position arises, the employer is obliged to offer the dismissed employee a new employment contract (Art. 107 par. 8 of the LA).

The court practice considers that the violation of provisions prohibiting the employment of new workers on the same position within the 6 months period shall not affect the validity of termination of the employment contract. The only sanction for the breach of the law would be responsibility for misdemeanour where the employer may be fined up to EUR 8,000. Another open point is that the LA does not define from which moment of time the 6 months period shall commence; whether it shall be from the adoption of the decision on dismissal by the employer, delivery of such decision to the employee or the expiry of the notice period. By analysing the wording of the verdicts of the Croatian courts, there is enough argument in place to argue that the term shall commence as of the delivery of the notice to the employee.

5. Collective redundancy

The employer is obliged to inform the works council about the intention to cancel employment contract and to perform consultations in cases, manner and under the conditions prescribed by the LA. In case the works council has not been established with certain employer, the consultations shall be performed with the trade union commissionaire who has taken over the rights and obligations of the works council (Art. 152 of the LA). The court practice has taken a stand that the negative opinion of the works council on the termination of the employment contract does not hinder employer to terminate the employment contract.

In case the employer intends to dismiss at least twenty employees within ninety days, provided at least five of the employees are to be dismissed due to operational reasons, the employer is obligated to perform consultations with the works council (Art. 120 of the LA). When complying with the duty to perform consultations, the employer shall supply the works council in writing with all the relevant information on the reasons for the projected redundancies, the total number and categories of employees, the number and categories of employees who are most likely to be made redundant, the time period over which the employment contracts are to be terminated, any additional criteria which the employer shall take into account when deciding on redundancies, the amounts and the methods for calculating severance pay and other payments.

6. Collective redundancy social security plan

The employer, who, after performed consultation on collective redundancies, still intends to terminate employment contracts due to operational reasons, is obligated to develop a redundancy social security plan (Art 121 LA). When preparing this plan, the employer makes consultations with the competent public employment service on the possibilities for retraining or additional training or employment of employees with another employer. The redundancy social security plan includes information on the reasons for redundancies, the possibilities of introducing changes in technology and organisation of work, the possibilities of assigning the employee to another job, the possibility of reducing working hours and the possibility of retraining or additional training for employees.

The employer shall deliver the redundancy social security plan to the competent public employment service and the works council. The works council may deliver to the competent public employment service and the employer the objections and proposals concerning the submitted redundancy social security plan. The competent public employment service is entitled to state its position concerning the redundancy social security plan within a period of 8 days from the receipt of such plan. In case the competent public employment service does not respond to the proposed redundancy social security plan, it shall be deemed that it has no objections or further proposals.

The employer shall be forbidden to dismiss employees to be declared as redundant according to the redundancy social security plan within a period 30 days from the submission of the plan to the competent public employment service. In case of important economic or social reason, the public employment service may suspend the implementation of dismissals for all or a part of employees who are to be made redundant under the developed redundancy social security plan for a maximum period of three months. This suspension may also be exercised if during this period of time such employees undergo retraining or additional training measures or if it is possible to apply the active employment measures on such employees.

7. Standpoints of the court practice

The most common reasons for cancellation of the employment due to operational reasons that may be found in the court practice are e.g. cancellation of certain departments within the company or decreasing of number of employees due to unprofitability (economic reason), redundancy due to automation of the business operations/tasks (technical reason) or redundancy due to reorganisation of business and elimination of business units in the company (organisational reason).

Notice due to operational reasons shall be deemed valid if the need for performing working tasks by certain worker ceased to exist. There is no obligation for eliminating the entire job position, but it shall be sufficient to reduce a number of employees working at the same job position. The liquidation procedure is another situation when the employer shall have a legitimate cause to terminate the employment contracts due to operational reasons.

Another way to terminate the employment contract due to operational reason would be by amending the systematisation of job positions within the company in the Employment By-Laws. Thus with the purpose to rationalising the business, the employer may decide to assign to one job position the assignments that were beforehand performed by workers working at two different job positions.

Find an Employment Lawyer

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

As an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel