News & Events

Absence Makes the Workplace . . . Stronger?

Submitted By Firm: Ice Miller LLP

Contact(s): Jenifer M. Brown, Michael A. Blickman


Michael L. Tooley

Date Published: 6/3/2014

Article Type:

Share This:

Most readers of this space grew up working in environments where physical presence in the workplace on a daily basis – now referred to by employment hipsters as "presentee-ism" – was non-negotiable. Three trends involving changes in technology, employee preference and a ground-breaking federal court decision may now be converging to change this presumption permanently for white-collar workers. Informed employers should consider not only what they should do to attract and retain a new generation of talented workers, but also what they must do to keep up with their evolving legal obligations.

Changes in Technology
The shift in our economy from the Industrial Age to the Information Age has seen a corresponding shift not just in what is being produced but also where. For workers in predominantly office environments (including administrative support functions for industrial employers), morning commutes, face time, and bricks and mortar are being replaced by telecommuting, working-from-home programs, and "results-only work environments" in which working remotely is not only tolerated but encouraged.

Knowledge workers in individual contributor roles now have the ability to do much of their work as easily from home or the nearest coffee shop through remote access, wireless technology and ubiquitous mobile devices. For workers involved in more collaborative efforts, virtual technologies such as Live Meeting, WebEx and Skype allow them to meet face-to-face – only those faces may be thousands of miles away from each other instead of across a conference table.

Changes in Employee Preference
Employee preferences are changing at an equally rapid pace. A study published in 2011 found that regular telecommuting by U.S. workers grew by 61 percent between 2005 and 2009. Based on those trends, the study predicted that regular telecommuters would total 4.9 million by 2016.

Even more Americans are taking advantage of the opportunity to work at home on a more limited basis. According to a Census Bureau report cited in The Wall Street Journal on March 5, 2013, approximately 9.4 percent of U.S. workers, or 13.4 million people, worked at least one day at home per week in 2010, compared with 7 percent, or 9.2 million, in 1997. (As but one example, any guess as to where this article was written?)

The growing employee preference for working remotely is highlighted in a report prepared by Global Workplace Analytics summarizing the results of over 500 studies on the impact of work-from-home programs. According to these studies:

  • 79 percent of people want to work from home.
  • 36 percent would choose it over a pay raise.
  • "Generation Y" workers are particularly attracted to flexible work arrangements, rating them as 8 on a 10 scale for impact on overall job satisfaction.
  • 61 percent of employees who do not currently work from home say they are willing to give up some pay in exchange for being allowed to do so.
  • 46 percent of companies that allow telecommuting say it has reduced attrition.
  • 72 percent of employers say telework has a high impact on employee retention.

Yahoo's new CEO, Marissa Mayer, apparently did not get the memo when she announced in early 2013 that employees would no longer be allowed to work from home regularly, in an effort to increase collaboration and teamwork. The backlash that followed her announcement in social media and the press may be the best evidence that working from home has now become a mainstream expectation.

Changes in the Law
Although whether and to what extent employees would be allowed to work home has been left to individual employers up to this point, a recent decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit may change that.

In Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ford Motor Co. (Case No. 5:11-cv-13742), the Court reversed its prior position that telecommuting was not a reasonable accommodation for most jobs under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and held that there was a genuine issue of fact requiring trial over whether Ford was entitled to require physical presence at the worksite for one of its workers.

The individual employee in that case, Harris, was a resale buyer with irritable bowel syndrome, which made it more difficult for her to maintain regular physical presence in her office. After her absences began to affect her job performance, Harris requested the ability to telecommute "on an as-needed basis" as an accommodation to her condition.

During the interactive process required by the ADA, Ford met with Harris and offered a number of alternative accommodations, including moving her cubicle closer to the restroom or working with her to find another job more suitable for telecommuting. When she rejected those alternatives, Ford ultimately terminated her employment based on its judgment that the essential functions of her specific job required her to have physical presence at its facility in order to interact with other members of her team. The EEOC then commenced a lawsuit under the ADA on her behalf.

The trial court granted Ford's motion for summary judgment based on federal court precedent holding that telecommuting was generally not a reasonable accommodation required by the ADA. The Sixth Circuit reversed, however, and made a number of remarkably broad statements about employers' evolving obligations to consider telecommuting requests made under the ADA.

Among other things, the Sixth Circuit noted that its prior decisions holding that physical attendance on the job was an essential function of most jobs had been issued when "technology was such that the workplace and an employer's brick-and-mortar location were synonymous." Due to changes in technology and work practices since then, however, the Court observed that:

[A]ttendance at the workplace can no longer be assumed to mean attendance at the employer's physical location. Instead, the law must respond to the advance of technology in the employment context, as it has in other areas of modern life, and recognize that the "workplace" is anywhere that an employee can perform her job duties.

The Court noted that while Ford produced evidence that face-to-face interaction and physical attendance were preferable for various aspects of Harris' position, it felt no obligation to defer to Ford's business judgment in this regard, stating:

[W]e should not abdicate our responsibility as a court to company personnel boards: While we do not allow plaintiffs to redefine the essential functions of their jobs based on their personal beliefs about job requirement . . . neither should we allow employers to redefine the essential functions of an employee's position to serve their own interests. Rather, we should carefully consider all of the relevant factors, of which the employer's business judgment is only one.

The Court went on to express its doubt that Harris' physical presence at work was necessary to allow her to perform the essential functions of her job, stating: "communications technology has advanced to the point that it is no longer an 'unusual case where an employee can effectively perform all work-related duties from home," and holding: "[i]n this case, we respond to the world as it exists now, and conclude that there is a genuine dispute of material fact regarding whether Harris can perform all of her job duties from a remote location."

What Should Employers Do Now?
For the moment, the immediate impact of the Sixth Circuit's decision will be felt by those employers within its jurisdiction of Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky and Tennessee. Ultimately, the limits of U.S. employers' obligations to consider telecommuting as a reasonable accommodation under the ADA likely will be determined by the United States Supreme Court or by Congress through legislation. In the meantime, informed employers should do the following:

  • From a legal standpoint, it may no longer be safe to have a bright-line rule that telecommuting requests will not be considered under any circumstances. Instead, employers should consider such requests on a case-by-case basis, analyzing and documenting whether the essential functions of the position genuinely require physical presence in the workplace or can be performed as effectively remotely.
  • From a business standpoint, consider whether allowing employees to work from home may actually improve productivity, employee job satisfaction, attrition and recruiting, particularly for incoming generations of workers already acclimated to the virtual world. If work-from-home policies actually work to produce better workplaces and better business results, then it makes good business sense to consider them, whether legally required to do so or not.

For questions regarding telecommuting policies and the various legal issues implicated by them, please contact any member of Ice Miller LLP's Labor and Employment Group.

This publication is intended for general information purposes only and does not and is not intended to constitute legal advice. The reader should consult with legal counsel to determine how laws or decisions discussed herein apply to the reader's specific circumstances. - See more at:

Find a Member

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

As an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel