• Home
  •  > 
  • Lawyer Directory
  •  > 
  • Deacons
  •  > 
  • Articles
  •  > 
  • The New Companies Ordinance Series (1) - Company Formation and Share Capital
    新《公司条例》系列 (1) - 公司组成及股本

News & Events

The New Companies Ordinance Series (1) - Company Formation and Share Capital
新《公司条例》系列 (1) - 公司组成及股本

Submitted By Firm: Deacons

Contact(s): Cynthia Chung


Machiuanna Chu

Date Published: 12/10/2013

Article Type: Legal Update

Share This:

The new Companies Ordinance ("New Companies Ordinance") will take effect on 3 March 2014. This alert, being the first of a series of our updates on the New Companies Ordinance, covers major changes in relation to company formation, share capital and document execution.

Abolition of Memorandum of Association ("Memorandum")

The Memorandum required under existing law will be abolished. The provisions of a company's existing Memorandum (such as the object clause, if it has one) will be deemed to be provisions of the Articles of Association, except that any provision regarding the "authorised share capital" will be removed.

Articles of Association ("Articles")

The Articles will become the only constitutional document of a company. It must contain mandatory clauses such as members' liabilities and contributions, and initial shareholdings. Certain concepts of existing companies (e.g. par value) will become redundant. While there is no legal requirement for existing companies to update their current articles, there are advantages of updating them in order to be able to enjoy certain benefits and new initiatives under the New Companies Ordinance.

New sets of Model Articles have also been prescribed under the New Companies Ordinance for different types of companies, which may be adopted in whole or in part.

Protection for Persons Dealing with a Company

A company's powers will be limited by any limitation set out in its Articles. A shareholder may sue to restrain the company from acting in contravention of the limitation.

In favour of a person dealing with a company in good faith, the power of the directors to bind the company will be deemed to be free of the limitation. Good faith will be presumed (unless rebutted), and mere knowledge that an act is beyond the directors' powers under the relevant documents is not bad faith. Further, outsiders are not obliged to inquire as to any limitations on the directors' power and will no longer be regarded as having constructive notice of matters contained in the publicly registered Articles or resolutions. The common law "indoor management rule" is now codified and expanded in the New Companies Ordinance.

The protection however will not apply if the parties to the transaction include an "insider" (i.e. a director of the company or its holding company, or an entity connected with the director). That said, in such a case, the transaction can still be saved if it is affirmed by the company. The New Companies Ordinance suggests that the rights of a third party (not being an insider) to the transaction are not affected, but at the same time gives the Court a wide power to affirm, sever or set aside the transaction on any terms the court thinks fit. How this new power will be exercised, and whether the rights of third parties will be adversely affected, remain to be seen.

The protection is also not available where the company is a charitable organisation registered without "Limited" in its name, subject to certain exceptions.

Share capital and no par value

The New Companies Ordinance adopts a mandatory system of no-par for all Hong Kong companies. This is in line with the international trend.

Under the existing law, shares issued by Hong Kong companies with a share capital must have a par value (also known as "nominal value"). Par value however is often criticized for failing to serve its original purpose of protecting creditors and shareholders, since the fixed face value rarely represents the real value of the shares in practice. Where a company issues shares at a price higher than its par value, the excess amount (known as "share premium") is required to be put into a share premium account and is subject to special use restrictions. That has given rise to a complex accounting regime.

Under the New Companies Ordinance, the concept of par value will be abolished. All existing shares will be treated as if they had no par value. In other words, there will be no minimum price for issuance of shares. The related concept of "share premium" will also become redundant. Any amount in a company's existing share premium account (and also capital redemption reserve) will become part of the company's share capital. Further, there will no longer be any requirement for an "authorised share capital" (i.e., the maximum share capital that a company proposes to be registered), though a company may state the maximum number of shares that it may issue in its Articles.

Companies will have greater flexibility under the New Companies Ordinance in altering their share capital in the no-par environment. A company will be able to increase its share capital without allotment of new shares (provided that the funds or assets are from its members), capitalize its profits without issuing new shares, and issue bonus shares without transferring an amount to the share capital account. Though there is no nominal value, shares can still be effectively "consolidated" or "subdivided" by reducing or increasing the number of shares without changing the amount of share capital. Limited companies may also re-denominate the currency of its share capital by passing an ordinary resolution.

The New Companies Ordinance contains transitional provisions to ensure that existing contractual rights defined by reference to par value and related concepts will not be affected by the abolition of par. That saves companies the trouble of amending documents executed before commencement of the New Companies Ordinance, but you may also wish to review your company's documents and Articles for the change to no-par.

Shareholders' approval for the grant of rights to subscribe for shares

Under the existing law, shareholders' approval is required before directors may exercise the power to allot shares (except a pro-rata issue to existing members and an allotment to the founder members). The protection will be extended under the New Companies Ordinance so that shareholders' approval will also be necessary before a company may grant rights to subscribe for, or convert any security into, shares. No further approval will be required when shares are allotted pursuant to any options granted.

Reasons for refusal to register a transfer

Under the existing regime, directors of private companies are often given the discretion to refuse to register a transfer of shares. Where a transfer is refused, the company shall send a notice of refusal to the transferor and transferee within 2 months but it is not obliged to give any reason. Under the New Companies Ordinance, the transferor or transferee will have the right to request for the reason of refusal, and the company will have to provide a statement of reasons within 28 days. The new provision intends to enhance transparency in the exercise of the directors' power.

Variation of class rights

The provisions on variation of rights attached to shares in a class are clarified and the procedures simplified. Any class rights may be varied in accordance with the Articles of the company or with 75% consent or special resolution of shareholders of that class. The company will be required to notify all class members of any variation. Corresponding provisions are also provided for in the New Companies Ordinance for companies without a share capital for filling the current statutory lacuna.

Statement of capital

A company is required to deliver to the Companies Registry a statement of capital whenever there is a change to its capital (e.g. allotment of shares or reduction of share capital). The statement will show the most up-to-date information about the company's issued capital. That enables the public to ascertain the capital structure of a company more easily.

Seal and execution of deeds

Under the existing law, a company must have a metallic common seal and a deed needs to be executed by the company by affixing its seal. While the sealing formality serves a cautionary function, it seems to be merely cumbersome in practice.

Under the New Companies Ordinance, the keeping and use of common seal will become optional. Instead of affixing the seal, a company may also execute a deed by having the document signed on its behalf by the director (if it has only 1 director), or by 2 directors (or a director and the company secretary) (if it has 2 or more directors). The document needs to state that it is executed by the company as a deed. The simplified execution requirements will facilitate business operations.

Under the New Companies Ordinance, any company with a common seal may have an official seal for use outside Hong Kong. The current restrictive requirements (e.g. authorization under Articles) in relation to keeping official seals for use abroad will be removed.

Scope of documents executed by attorneys

The current Ordinance only recognizes the binding effect of deeds executed by a company's attorney outside Hong Kong. The distinction between execution of deeds locally or overseas will be removed under the New Companies Ordinance. A company may authorise any person as its attorney to execute a deed or any other document on its behalf in Hong Kong or elsewhere. That gives greater flexibility to companies in terms of document execution.

We will discuss other changes in the New Companies Ordinance in the next legal update.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

新《公司条例》系列 (1) - 公司组成及股本















根据新公司条例,面值的概念将被废除。所有现有股份将被视作犹如其并无面值一样。换言之,公司发行股份时将没有最低价格限制。相关的「股份溢价」概念亦不再适用。公司现有「股份溢价帐」(以及「资本赎回储备」)中的款额将成为公司股本的一部分。此外, 公司不再须要设有「法定股本」(即公司拟注册的最高股本金额),但公司仍可在其章程细则内述明其可发行的最高股份数目。.


















Find an Employment Lawyer

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

As an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel