News & Events

IRS Issues Revised Form 720 for Payment of PCORI Fees July 31 Payment Deadline Looms for Many Plan Sponsors

Submitted By Firm: Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC

Contact(s): Louis P. DiLorenzo, Thomas G. Eron

Author(s):

John Godsoe

Date Published: 6/28/2013

Article Type: Legal Update

Share This:

The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) recently issued a revised Form 720, “Quarterly Excise Tax Return,” to provide for the reporting and payment of fees imposed on specified health insurance issuers and plan sponsors of certain self-insured health plans by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (“Affordable Care Act”). The fees help fund the Patient-Centered Outcome Research Institute (“PCORI”) which is intended to assist research efforts to help patients, clinicians, purchasers and policymakers make informed health decisions. For many plans (including calendar year plans), the initial PCORI fee must be paid by July 31, 2013. In general, the applicable insurance company pays the PCORI fee for specified health insurance plans and the plan sponsor is responsible for the payment of the PCORI fee owed with respect to a self-insured health plan. This memorandum describes the PCORI fee payment requirements that apply to self-insured health plans.

Plans Subject to The Fee

The PCORI fee is payable by the plan sponsor of an “applicable self-insured health plan.” Such plans include most self-insured medical and prescription drug plans, and health reimbursement arrangements (“HRAs”). Health flexible spending arrangements (“FSAs”) and plans that are limited to vision and dental benefits will only be subject to the PCORI fee if the benefits are not considered HIPAA excepted benefits (any benefit that is considered an excepted benefit under Section 9832(c) of the Internal Revenue Code is not subject to the PCORI fee). HIPAA excepted health FSAs generally include those that are funded solely by employee elective contributions and those to which the plan sponsor makes a contribution that does not exceed two times the employee’s elective contributions (or, if greater, the employee’s elective contributions for the year, plus $500). Employee assistance programs (“EAPs”), disease management and wellness programs will be subject to the PCORI fee only if they provide “significant” benefits in the form of medical care or treatment. While most dental, vision and health flexible spending account plans are considered HIPAA excepted benefits, and most EAPs, disease management and wellness programs do not provide significant benefits in the form of medical care or treatment, plan sponsors who offer these arrangements should analyze each arrangement to ensure that it is not subject to the PCORI fee. Selfinsured policies designed to cover employees who are working and residing outside of the United States also are not subject to the PCORI fee.

Fee Amount

The PCORI fee is based on the average number of covered lives during the applicable plan year. Covered lives include COBRA qualified beneficiaries and retirees covered by an applicable self-insured health plan. For plan years ending after September 30, 2012 and before October 1, 2013, the fee is $1 multiplied by the average number of covered lives under the plan during the plan year. This amount increases to $2 for plan years ending after September 30, 2013 and before October 1, 2014. For subsequent plan years, the applicable dollar amount is indexed based on national health expenditures (the final plan year for which a PCORI fee will be owed is the last plan year ending before October 1, 2019).

Plan sponsors of applicable self-insured health plans are permitted to use one of the following three methods to determine the average number of covered lives:

Actual Count Method: Under the actual count method, a plan sponsor determines the average number of covered lives by adding the totals of lives covered for each day during the plan year and dividing that total number by the number of days in the plan year.

Snapshot Method: Under the snapshot method, a plan sponsor determines the average number of covered lives by adding the total lives covered on one or more dates during the first, second, or third month of each quarter during the plan year and dividing that total by the number of dates on which a count was made. The applicable regulations contain special rules for selecting these dates. The regulations provide for two separate methods in determining total lives covered. Under the “snapshot method,” the number of total lives equals the actual number of lives on the counting date. Under the “snapshot factor” method, the number of total lives is determined by adding the number of participants with self-only coverage plus the number of participants with coverage other than self-only coverage on the counting date, multiplied by 2.35.

Form 5500 Method: A plan sponsor may determine the average number of lives covered under a plan for a plan year based on the number of participants reported on the Form 5500 that is filed for the applicable self-insured health plan for that plan year. For a plan offering only “self-only” coverage, the average number of lives covered under a plan for the plan year is the sum of the total participants covered at the beginning and end of the plan year, divided by 2. The average number of lives covered under a plan that offers self-only coverage plus other coverage options equals the sum of the total participants covered at the beginning and end of the plan year. Note that plans utilizing the Form 5500 method can only do so if the Form 5500 is filed by the PCORI fee due date (e.g., a calendar year plan that that utilizes the 2-1/2 month extension to file the Form 5500 may not use the Form 5500 method).

If a plan sponsor maintains more than one applicable self-insured health plan, the plans can be treated as a single applicable self-insured health plan provided the two plans have the same plan year. For example, if a plan sponsor maintains both a self-insured medical plan and a self-insured prescription drug plan, these two plans could be considered one plan for purposes of the PCORI fees, provided the two plans have the same plan year. Similarly, if a plan sponsor maintains an HRA and an applicable self-insured health plan, the HRA and the health plan may be considered a single health plan if they share the same plan year.

There are also special rules for counting covered lives for health FSAs and HRAs that are subject to the PCORI fee (i.e., FSAs and HRAs that are not HIPAA excepted benefits). If the plan sponsor only offers a health FSA or HRA and not other applicable self-insured health plans, the plan sponsor may treat each participant’s health FSA or HSA as covering a single life (the participant’s spouse and dependents are not counted).

Notwithstanding the general rules described above for determining the average number of covered lives during a plan year, for plan years beginning before July 11, 2012 and ending on or after October 1, 2012, plan sponsors are permitted to use any reasonable method to determine the average number of lives covered under an applicable self-insured health plan. This limited relief could be helpful to sponsors of self-insured health plans that are calendar year plans.

Payment of PCORI Fees - Revised Form 720

The PCORI fee is required to be reported annually on IRS Form 720. The Form 720 is due on July 31 of the year following the last day of the plan year. The IRS recently updated the Form 720 and instructions to address the PCORI fee. For plan sponsors that file Form 720 solely to report the PCORI fee, only one Form 720 needs to be filed annually (i.e., even though the Form 720 is a quarterly tax form, only a single Form 720 should be filed for the second quarter of each year). Payment should be made with the related payment voucher, Form 720-V. Form 720 and Form 720-V can be found at: www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f720.pdf and the instructions can be found at www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i720.pdf .

IRS Rules PCORI Fees Are Deductible

Plan sponsors received some good news recently when the IRS ruled that the PCORI fees paid are considered ordinary and necessary business expenses and, therefore, are deductible under Section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Recommended Actions

Sponsors of applicable self-insured health plans that operate on a calendar year plan year, or on a plan year that began between October 1, 2011 and December 31, 2011, must make the initial PCORI fee payment by July 31, 2013 (PCORI fee payments for all other plans are not due until July 31, 2014). Sponsors of plans that are subject to the July 31, 2013 payment deadline should begin to take steps to pay the applicable fee, to the extent that they have not done so already. These steps include (1) determining the number of applicable self-insured health plans maintained by the organization, (2) determining the average number of covered lives for each plan, and (3) preparing and submitting the revised IRS Form 720 by the July 31st due date.

If you have any questions about this memorandum, please contact John Godsoe in our Buffalo office (716-566-2850, jgodsoe@bsk.com) or any of the other members of our Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Practice Group listed below.

Find an Employment Lawyer

In all 50 U.S. states, every Canadian province, and over 135 countries. View or print a complete ELA member list by clicking here.

Find an Immigration Lawyer

Facilitate employee transfers around the globe. View or print a complete ELA member list by clicking here.

International Background Checks Summaries

Your free resource summarizing the requirements for pre-employment checks around the world.

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

As an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld
Partner 

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel

Sanmina-SCI

Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.

Starwood

We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel  

Loading...