News & Events

Bill Introducing Work & Security Act

Submitted By Firm: Boekel De Nerée

Contact(s): Eugenie Nunes, Sascha C. Kuit

Author(s):

Hester Uhlenbroek, Marian van Eck, Afra Pepping

Date Published: 12/16/2013

Article Type: Legal Update

Share This:

The Dutch government submitted a legislative proposal for the Work & Security Act to the Dutch Lower House on 29 November 2013. The proposal details plans to reform the law governing dismissal, unemployment benefits and flexible employment as agreed in April 2013 by the government, trade unions and employers’ organisations in the Social Agreement. In earlier publications we gave you a broad outline of this along with envisaged implementation dates. In this newsflash we will discuss the most important aspects of the legislative proposal.

Flexible work (envisaged implementation date: 1 July 2014)

Provisions on successive fixed-term employment contracts

A limit will be set on the possibilities to conclude successive temporary contracts with an employee. If successive temporary employment contracts are interrupted by no more than six months (currently three months), the last contract will be converted by law into a contract for an indefinite period if a) that contract is the fourth one in succession, or b) the temporary contracts have lasted a total of more than two years (currently three years).

Under present Dutch law, a collective labour agreement may depart from these provisions to the disadvantage of employees. The bill sets limits on this: a collective labour agreement may raise the maximum number of temporary contracts to six and the maximum duration to four years, but only in the event of temporary contracts through an employment agency, or if the nature of business operations in an industry makes it necessary to depart from this for certain jobs. As examples, the explanatory memorandum to the bill names work with project-based funding in e.g. the media or cultural or scientific projects. It will not be possible for a collective agreement to depart from the maximum interruption period of six months. A collective agreement may only depart, without limit, from the provisions on successive fixed-term employment contracts to the disadvantage of directors of legal entities.

The provisions on successive fixed-term employment contracts will not apply to employees under the age of 18 who work fewer than 12 hours per week or to employment contracts to be designated by the minister of Social Affairs and Employment (these will basically be contracts concluded with a view to the training of employees, so-called work-study programmes). The Minister can also give his consent to a collective agreement declaring the provisions inapplicable to jobs in industries that can only work with temporary contracts, for example professional football.

Duty to disclose whether a temporary contract will be extended or not
When a temporary contract or successive temporary contracts of six months or more come to an end, the employer will have to inform the employee in writing, at least one month before the contract ends, as to whether or not it will extend the employment contract, as well as the conditions under which the contract will be renewed. If the employer fails to meet this obligation, it will be required to pay one month’s salary to the employee. If the employer does not inform the employee in good time, it will owe pro rata remuneration to the employee.
 
Non-competition clause
It will no longer be permissible to include a non-competition clause in a temporary contract unless the employer explains, in writing, the considerable business interests that make such a clause necessary. A non-competition clause in a temporary contract without stating reasons is null and void.
 
Trial period clause
Temporary contracts lasting six months or less may no longer include a trial period.
 
Obligation to continue to pay salary  for hours not worked
Under present Dutch law, an employer can make written arrangements with an employee stating that the obligation to continue to pay a salary for the hours the employer has not provided work will not apply for the first six months of the employment contract. This period can be extended without limit by collective agreement. This is often the case for standby contracts. The bill sets a limit on the possibility of extending such arrangements: the length of time for which the obligation to continue to pay a salary can be excluded can only be extended in a collective agreement for specific jobs designated in that agreement, the duties of which have no fixed scope and are of an incidental nature. At the request of the Employment Foundation ( Stichting van de Arbeid), the Minister may order that no departures will be allowed from the obligation to continue to pay salary in certain industries. Zero hours contracts will be prohibited in certain parts of the care sector.

Transitional provisions

The new provisions for successive temporary employments contracts will apply if, before or after the act comes into force, a temporary employment contract ends and, after the act comes into force, a new temporary contract is concluded within six months after the expiry of the earlier contract.

A temporary employment contract that has not yet been in force for two years when the act takes effect but that was concluded for more than two years will not automatically be shortened to two years. 

If a collective agreement includes a departure from the provisions on successive contracts or the obligation to continue to pay a salary, then the former legislation will continue to apply to employment contracts that are subject to that collective agreement and are concluded after the new legislation takes effect. The new legislation will apply as from the date of expiry of the collective agreement, but in any case 1 ½ years after the legislation takes effect.

Law governing dismissal (envisaged implementation date: 1 July 2015)

The UWV or sub-district court must give prior permission to terminate employment

Under the new law an employer will need permission from the Employee Insurance Agency (“UWV”) to terminate an employment contract on account of a reorganisation or an employee’s long-term incapacity for work. For termination on other grounds, the employer must apply to the sub-district court. Under the new law, the employer will no longer be able to choose between termination with a permit from the UWV or applying to the sub-district court to set aside an employment contract.

To obtain permission from the UWV or the sub-district court, an employer will have to have a reasonable ground for terminating the employment contract. These grounds are to be stated in the Dutch Civil Code. A request for termination on the grounds of unsatisfactory performance may be refused if the employer has not done enough to provide sufficient training for the employee.

Under present law, no permission is needed from the UWV to terminate the contracts of employees who on the basis of an employment contract work in the public service, for people employed in special education and for holders of spiritual offices. In future a permit will be required for their dismissal. For other employees whose dismissal does not now require a permit, such as directors under the articles of association, permission will not be required under the new legislation either.

Redundancy committee instead of UWV

The bill makes it possible to ask a committee to assess the request to terminate employment instead of the UWV, provided that a procedure for this type of assessment has been included in the collective labour agreement. The committee must be independent of the employer and the assessment procedure must meet certain requirements: both sides must be heard, confidentiality must be observed and reasonable reply periods must be allowed.

Termination with the permission of the UWV or redundancy committee; notice period less the time required for the procedure

The employer may deduct the time actually required for the procedure (this period is currently fixed at one month) conducted by the UWV or the committee from the notice period provided that the remaining notice period is not less than one month. The time required for the procedure starts on the day that the UWV or the committee has received the complete request for termination up to the day of its decision. The decision must state the amount of time that was required for the procedure, so that the remaining notice period can be calculated.

Having an employment contract set aside by the sub-district court

The setting aside of the employment contract by the sub-district court will be the appropriate route if an employer wishes to dismiss an employee on account of ‘reasons lying in the person of the employee’: unsatisfactory performance, culpable acts or omissions by the employee, a damaged working relationship or refusal to perform work on account of serious conscientious objections. The sub-district court can also set aside the employment contract if regular illness on the part of an employee has unacceptable consequences on business operations. Finally, the sub-district court can set aside an employment contract on account of other circumstances as a result of which the employer cannot reasonably be required to allow the employment contract to continue.

The employee’s assent to dismissal; fourteen-day period of reflection

If an employee assents to his dismissal, he may retract his assent in writing within fourteen days without stating reasons. If a termination agreement has been concluded, the employee may terminate this agreement within fourteen days without stating reasons by informing the employer of this in writing. The employee’s right of retraction and right of termination may not be excluded.

Termination due to the employee reaching retirement age and afterwards

The proposed legislation will make it possible (unless the parties have made other arrangements in writing) to terminate the employment contract without the permission of the UWV as of or after the day on which the employee reaches the state pension age or another agreed retirement age (whether higher or lower). If a retirement age lower than the state pension age has been agreed, then permission will not be required for dismissal on reaching that lower age, but such dismissal may still be contrary to the rules on equality. If the parties concluded an employment contract for an indefinite period after the employee reached the state pension age or some other retirement age, then permission to terminate this contract will be required. 

Transition payment

If the employer terminates an employment contract that has lasted for 24 months or more, it will have to make a transition payment to the employee. It makes no difference whether the contract was temporary or for an indefinite period. In this case the legislature takes termination to mean dismissal, setting aside or non-continuation after expiry of a temporary contract. 

There is no entitlement to a transition payment on termination by mutual consent. However, the transition payment will undoubtedly play a role in negotiations about such termination. An employer is not required to make a transition payment if the initiative to terminate came from the employee, unless the latter did so on account of serious culpable acts or omissions on the part of the employer. Nor is the employer required to make a transition payment if the employee has carried out serious culpable acts or omissions. No transition payment is due on termination of an employment contract for less than 12 hours per week with an employee under the age of 18, or on termination of an employment contract as of or after the day on which the employee reaches the state pension age or another agreed retirement age (whether higher or lower).

The transition payment is calculated as follows: for the first 120 months of the employment contract, the transition payment is one-sixth of the monthly salary for each six-month period that the employment contract was in force. After these 120 months the payment is one-quarter of the monthly salary for each subsequent six-month period. The proposed text of the act makes it clear that in calculating the transition payment, the legislature worked with six-monthly steps, whereas the sub-district court formula works with years of service. Just as is the case for the provisions for successive contracts, successive employment contracts interrupted by a maximum of six months are added together. If an employee takes up the same or nearly the same work for the next employer, and if the next employer has been able to gain sufficient insight into the employee’s skills, then the employment contract with the former employer is also taken into consideration in calculating the transition payment. The transition payment is subject to a maximum of € 75,000 or a maximum of one annual salary for an employee who earns more than € 75,000 per year. The parties may decide to agree a higher transition payment when they conclude the employment contract.

Until 1 January 2020 employees aged 50 and over on their dismissal and who have been in employment for ten years or more will be entitled to a higher transition payment for the years in which they were employed after their 50th birthday, namely one half of a monthly salary instead of one-quarter of a monthly salary for each six-month period. This special scheme will not apply to employers with less than 25 employees in the last half year before the year in which the employment contract was terminated.

By analogy with the sub-district court formula, monthly salary is deemed to be the gross monthly salary plus fixed salary components such as holiday allowance, a fixed 13th month payment, habitual overtime pay and a fixed shift allowance. The minister will announce in an order in council in what very exceptional cases the employer’s share in the pension contribution, the company car, expense allowances, the employer’s contribution towards health care insurance and incidental and non-agreed salary components can be part of the transition payment. 

The transition payment is meant to compensate the employee for dismissal and also to enable him to increase his chances of finding a new job through training or a coaching programme to help him find different work. An employee is not obliged to use the payment for training purposes. The minister will announce in an order in council what costs the employer may deduct from the transition payment. This will involve costs of training, outplacement, a longer notice period than the statutory one or other costs incurred by the employer during the employment period to make the employee capable of performing a variety of jobs.

Fair compensation

In addition to a transition payment, the sub-district court can also award an employee fair compensation if the case involves seriously culpable acts or omissions on the part of the employer. This fair compensation will depend on the circumstances of the case. The so-called consequences criterion (is the dismissal reasonable in light of its consequences for the employee as well as the measures taken by the employer?), which now plays a role in the procedure for manifestly unreasonable dismissal, is taken into consideration in the transition payment. The manifestly unreasonable dismissal procedure, which an employee may now conduct if his employment contract was terminated with the permission of the UWV, will also end if this bill is adopted.

Departure from the so-called proportionality principle (afspiegelingsbeginsel)

The proportionality principle will continue to be the starting point for determining the order in which the employer wishes employees to be considered for dismissal for economic reasons. However, a collective agreement may depart from the proportionality principle for at most 10% of the employees who would be considered for dismissal on the basis of that principle. To be eligible for such departure, an employee will have to perform at a level that is demonstrably higher than average or have a future potential greater than average. If an employer is to be permitted to make such a departure, it must pursue a clear policy in advance so that employees are given equal chances and know the consequences their performance may have on a possible future dismissal. This option does not apply to the age categories of 15-25 or 55 and up. If an employee objects to the departure from the proportionality principle, the objection will have to be assessed by a committee set up by the parties to the collective agreement that is independent of the employer.

Payroll employees and work-disabled persons

In the bill, the legislature has announced more detailed rules to strengthen the position of payroll employees. Their protection from dismissal will then become the same as that for employees who are employed directly by the employer. At the request of the employer, it will be possible to leave work-disabled persons outside the scope of the proportionality principle.

Objection to the UWV decision

If an employee is of the opinion that the UWV wrongly gave its permission for dismissal, or if he was dismissed without the permission of the UWV, he will be able to ask the sub-district court to reinstate the employment contract, or to award him fair compensation instead. The employee must do so within two months after the end of the employment contract. If the UWV has refused its permission for dismissal, an employer may apply to the sub-district court to set aside the employment contract. The judge will assess the request against the same criteria as the UWV. 

Appeal

The bill allows an appeal against a decision to set aside an employment contract (in contrast to the present regulation). But an appeal will not suspend implementation of the decision of the judge of sub-district court. This means that an employment contract terminates when an application to have it set aside is allowed, even if the employee lodges an appeal. If the decision to set aside the contract is rejected on appeal, the judge can order the employer to reinstate the employment contract or to award the employee fair compensation instead. If the judge decides on appeal that an application to set aside the contract was wrongly rejected in the first instance, he will decide on what date the employment contract will terminate.

Unemployment benefits (envisaged implementation date: January 2016)

Limitation of maximum duration of unemployment benefits

Between 1 January 2016 and 1 July 2019 the maximum duration of unemployment benefits will gradually be shortened by one month per quarter, from the present 38 months to 24 months. In their collective agreement, trade unions and employer organisations can agree a maximum extension of 14 months for unemployment benefits. In principle, the Minister of Social Affairs and Unemployment will extend such agreements to apply to a whole industry where the collective agreement already applies to the majority of employees in that industry.

More limited accrual of entitlement to unemployment benefits

Under present law, each year of employment history leads to one extra month of entitlement to unemployment benefits. This will still be the case for the first ten years of employment history, but each subsequent year will lead to only half a month of unemployment benefits. The employment history built up until 2016 will be honoured. This means that each year of employment history before 2016 gives entitlement to one month of unemployment benefits, but never more than the maximum that applies to an employee when he becomes unemployed. For example, an employee who is entitled to 38 months of unemployment benefits as of 1 January 2016 who then becomes unemployed on 1 August 2016 will be entitled to unemployment benefits for 35 months because the 3 elapsed calendar quarters are deducted.

Suitable work

In anticipation of the limitation on the maximum duration of unemployment benefits, the definition of suitable work will be tightened as of 1 July 2015. At present, for the first six months of his entitlement to unemployment benefits a person may focus on work at the same level as the work he has just lost. After six months, work for which a lower level of education is required is deemed to be suitable work as well and after one year, all work is deemed to be suitable. As of 1 July 2015, just six months after a person becomes unemployed, all work will be deemed to be suitable. This stricter definition will also apply to the term suitable work in the Sickness Benefits Act.

Find an Employment Lawyer

In all 50 U.S. states, every Canadian province, and over 135 countries. View or print a complete ELA member list by clicking here.

Find an Immigration Lawyer

Facilitate employee transfers around the globe. View or print a complete ELA member list by clicking here.

Global Business Immigration Law Handbook

Your free resource for obtaining key business immigration law information worldwide.

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

As an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld
Partner 

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel

Sanmina-SCI

Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.

Starwood

We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel  

Loading...