News & Events

Important Supreme Court decision on termination and PILONS

Submitted By Firm: Addleshaw Goddard

Contact(s): Michael Leftley, Sarah Harrop

Author(s):

Amanda Steadman

Date Published: 2/11/2013

Article Type: Legal Update

Share This:

The Supreme Court has handed down its decision in Société Générale, London Branch v Geys which confirms that: (i) an employment contract is not terminated by way of a repudiatory breach unless and until that breach is accepted by the innocent party; and (ii) where a party to an employment relationship wishes to lawfully terminate the contract, it must notify the other party in "clear and unambiguous" terms that the right to bring the contract to an end is being exercised.  Where an employer wishes to effect immediate termination by relying on a payment in lieu of notice (PILON) clause, it must, in addition to making the payment itself, give clear and unambiguous notice to the employee that the contract is being terminated with immediate effect in accordance with the PILON provision.

Background

The Claimant was employed by Société Générale (SG) under a written contract of employment containing a provision that the employment could be terminated on 3 months' notice.  The contract also incorporated further terms set out in SG's Staff Handbook, including a provision which allowed for immediate termination "by making a payment [to you] in lieu of notice".  Where this provision was exercised, the contract also required SG to make a termination payment, which included a "compensation payment" calculated by reference to the date the employment terminated.  Where the date was after 31 December 2007, the Claimant was entitled to a compensation payment reflecting awards made to him in 2006 and 2007 (circa €12.5 million).  Where the date was before 31 December 2007, the compensation would reflect awards made to him in 2005 and 2006, which were significantly lower (circa €8 million).

The following events took place towards the end of 2007:

  • On 29 November 2007 the Claimant was summarily dismissed in breach of the terms of the employment contract.  SG did not notify the Claimant that it was terminating immediately in accordance with the PILON.
  • On 7 December 2007 the Claimant's solicitors wrote to SG asking for further information about the sums that it was offering to pay and also reserving all of the Claimant's rights.
  • On 10 December 2007 SG sent the Claimant a draft severance agreement together with a letter listing the payments that it proposed to make to him.  The Claimant was asked to agree the terms set out in the letter by returning a signed copy, but he did not do so.
  • On 18 December 2007 SG paid approximately £32,000 into the Claimant's bank account.  This money represented the sums due under the PILON clause.  SG did not notify the Claimant that this payment had been made or what it represented.
  • SG then sent a payslip (and a P45) to the Claimant which set out the various elements of the payment made on 18 December 2007.  The Claimant did not see this payslip until either 7 or 8 January 2008 (having been away from the UK over the Christmas period).  The Claimant said in evidence that he assumed the payment was intended to represent the PILON but he was not sure.
  • On 21 December 2007 the Claimant's solicitors responded to SG asking for further information, including on how the proposed payments had been calculated.  They confirmed that the Claimant's rights remained reserved.
  • On 2 January 2008 the Claimant's solicitors wrote to SG stating that the Claimant had decided to "affirm his contract of employment".  They also confirmed that the Claimant reserved his position in respect of the monies paid on 18 December 2007 until he understood what they represented.
  • On 4 January 2008 SG wrote to the Claimant confirming details of the termination of his employment, which stated that the PILON payment was credited to his bank account on 18 December 2007.  Under the deemed notice provisions of the Staff Handbook, this letter was deemed received on 6 January 2008.

The Claimant subsequently brought a claim in the High Court for wrongful dismissal and breach of contract.  The High Court held that the employment contract terminated on 6 January 2008. This was because the letter of 4 January 2008 was the first time that SG had notified the Claimant that it had exercised the right to terminate immediately in accordance with the PILON provision.  This letter was deemed received on 6 January 2008, hence this was the termination date.

SG appealed to the Court of Appeal arguing that the repudiatory breach of contract on 29 November 2007 automatically brought the contract of employment to an end and it was not open to the Claimant to accept or reject that breach.  In the alternative, SG argued that if the contract did not terminate on 29 November 2007, then it terminated on 18 December 2007 when the PILON payment was credited to the Claimant's bank account.  The Court rejected the argument that the repudiatory breach automatically ended the contract and it was open to the Claimant to affirm the contract (which he did),  However, the Court agreed that the contract terminated on the date that the PILON payment was made.  This was decided on the basis that the Staff Handbook was clear that all SG needed to do was make the payment. 

Decision of the Supreme Court

The Claimant appealed to the Supreme Court and SG cross-appealed on the "automatic termination" point.  By a majority, the Court upheld the Claimant's appeal and rejected SG's cross-appeal.  It was held:

  • A wrongful repudiation terminates the contract only if and when it is accepted by the innocent party.  The automatic termination approach would reward a wrongful repudiator by allowing him to choose a termination date which suits him.  In this case, this meant that it could not be said that the contract terminated on 29 November 2007.
  • The employment relationship requires that the other party be notified in "clear and unambiguous terms" that the right to end the contract is being exercised and how and when it is intended to operate.  This is necessary so that both parties know where they stand as there may be rights (such as insurance benefits and entitlements to bonuses) which depend upon the employment continuing.  In this case, clear and unambiguous notice was not given to the Claimant until 6 January 2008.  Therefore, this was the termination date.

Comment

On the repudiation issue, this case confirms that:

  • Where the employee commits a repudiatory breach, the employer should consider whether it wishes to accept the breach or affirm the contract.  There may be cases where an employer would wish to affirm the contract (e.g. if the employee resigned without giving full notice and the employer wished to hold the employee to his notice period - although in practice, it is likely that an employee who wished to escape his notice period would seek to argue that the employer had committed a repudiatory breach and he was resigning in response to the breach).  In either case, the employer should ensure it communicates its decision to the employee.
  • Where the employer commits a repudiatory breach, the employer should be mindful of the fact that this will not bring the contract to an end unless and until the employee accepts the breach.  Accordingly, if the employer is concerned to bring the contract to an immediate end, then it must ensure that it complies with the terms of an immediate termination provision in the contract (e.g. a PILON provision or another provision entitling summary dismissal).

On the notification issue, this case confirms the importance of clearly notifying the employee that the right to end the contract (whether by way of a PILON or otherwise) is being exercised and how and when it is intended to operate.  Where the contract is to be ended by way of a PILON, the Court noted that a "wise employer" would give such notification in writing but that it would be possible to do this verbally when handing over a payment. 

Société Générale, London Branch v Geys

 

 

 

 

 

Find an Employment Lawyer

In all 50 U.S. states, every Canadian province, and over 135 countries. View or print a complete ELA member list by clicking here.

Find an Immigration Lawyer

Facilitate employee transfers around the globe. View or print a complete ELA member list by clicking here.

Global Business Immigration Law Handbook

Your free resource for obtaining key business immigration law information worldwide.

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

As an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld
Partner 

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel

Sanmina-SCI

Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.

Starwood

We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel  

Loading...